From Doctrine of Ex officio to Doctrine of Adversary Hearing
Suzanne Johnston,President Terry Quinn,Erica Bryant Barnabas,Elizabeth Ciaccio,Richard Stensrud,William D. Johnson,Jeffrey W. States,Nancy Wolford-Landers,Lisa Odenbach-Esquier,Audrey Peartree,Kathryn T. Regalia,Terrence M. Rickard,Thomas Guenthner,William Hendrickson,Mary Sullivan,Andrea Tomaino,Margaret Trevett,John Kennedy,Kristin Vanden Brul,George Kondos,Norman Lieska,Gary Loy,David Mayer,Michele Raible,Ben Roitberg,Ruth A. Seeler,Nipa Shah,Christiane Stahl,Thomas Stamos,Ara Tekian,Larry Tobacman,James Unnerstall,P. Conley,Jorge Girotti,S. Huhndorf,S. Jacobson,K. Kashima,J. Mendez,L. J. Sandlow,C. Scherrer,L. Troy
2005-01-01
Abstract:The doctrine of ex officio has been the ruling principle of our country's civil procedure for a long time. With the reform of the way of trial, the doctrine of adversary hearing was established primarily through the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court. However, current doctrine of adversary hearing in civil procedure is far away from perfection. In order to overcome existing limitations and to improve the doctrine, it is very necessary to construct its theoretic system, to change the out-of-date thinking way of the judges, to amend, supplement, and perfect its institutions.