Examining Mediation as the Opportunity Cost of Litigation: Can it be Sustained in the Long Term?
David O. Adetoro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14041040500331853
2005-06-15
Abstract:Provision for appropriate dispute resolution clauses in international commercial contracts has evolved to become an essential ingredient in contemporary competitive markets. They also serve as a pre‐emptive remedy, necessitating further demands for cheaper remedies in dispute management, specifically alternative dispute resolution2 2. Hereinafter referred to as ‘ADR’. View all notes processes such as arbitration, conciliation and mediation. Further, there is the question whether the business community could sustain the average commercial fees for dispute settlement without becoming a source of resentment or revolt in the long term. This essay examines the economic cost of dispute settlement with a bias towards mediation, as well as other issues concerning creative management of disputes. This informs a more compelling need to reconsider the costs of disputes in economic terms: analysing comparative merits/utilities of mediation and determining what the opportunity cost of mediation in international commercial contracts is and whether it is cost efficient in comparison with other forms of dispute resolution process. ‘For the rational study of the law the black letter man may be the man of the present, but the man of the future is the man of statistics and master of economics. We learn that of everything we have, we have to give up something else, and we are taught to set the advantage we gain against the other advantage we lose, and to know what we are doing when we elect’ 3 3. Oliver Wendell Holmes, ‘The path of law’, 10 Harvard Law Review (1897), 474. NB. This quotation is brought in as a prelude, setting the foundation for the necessary nexus between Law, Dispute and Economics, considered in this paper as the essence of legal management of dispute. The assertion that ‘a lawyer without any knowledge of mathematics would soon become an enemy of the public’ has become a popular cliché. However, the position of this paper is anchored on the premise that a pragmatic application of mathematics through economics occupies a position of importance in business management and therefore the paper argues that this position impacts and will continue to impact on dispute management. View all notes