Logic of Elucidation of Court
Yan Renqun
2012-01-01
Abstract:Court's elucidation can sometimes change the result of a case,thus should follow its intrinsic logic.It may not violate the primary purpose of protecting right and vindicating justice and other reasonable purposes.Judges may not elucidate beyond the facts presented by the parties and actually displayed to court either.These are elucidation's boundaries on goal and fact.In the boundaries,judges may inform the parties all kinds of rights except for the right of defense on statute of limitation,otherwise the primary purpose of elucidation would be violated.In the factual boundary of elucidation,judges should give all kinds of elucidation corresponding to its proper aim.If the plaintiff claims less than he could get,judges can also tell him to amend his claim.When judges cannot be sure of what fact is,they can prompt both parties to produce more evidences. Although court's obligation of elucidation has made judges more active,elucidation has no positive connection with the partiality of the judge.If judges follow the logic of elucidation,they should not be censured.Elucidation is not exceptional,and judges can do it positively and widely as long as it doesn't deviate from its logic.Elucidation about new materials does not inevitably overstep the adversary doctrine or the factual boundary of elucidation.In some circumstances,judges should elucidate even when the party is represented by a lawyer. Most of the elucidation hasn't broken through the adversary doctrine,but it doesn't mean that the doctrine is absolute and cannot be broken.In the United States,the court should grant the relief to the party entitled,even if the party has not demanded that relief in his pleadings.This reminds us to review our thought on the disposition right of the parties.Limited by their legal knowledge,parties often do not claim some rights of their own and some important facts,so judges should inform them and let them decide whether to claim complementally.This is the true respect to the disposition right of the parties.We welcome that kind of activism which makes great efforts to realize substantial justice and procedural justice,and value parties as the subject of the procedure.