Abstract:Legal syllogism is the basic model which is used by the accuser,the defender and the judge in criminal trial.What is its logical foundation? There are mainly three kinds of viewpoints up to now.According to traditional theory,it is categorical syllogism,and deductivists think it is whole deductive logic,while anti-deductivists deny that logic plays an important role in a trial.In this paper,our conclusion is that legal syllogism must have its logical foundation,so we criticize anti-deductivist standpoint of realism.In conclusion,we investigate the logical foundation of legal argument in criminal trial,and then revise the traditional legal argument theory on the basis of non-monotonic logic by representing the rule of presumed innocent in the default rule.

On Logical Foundation of Legal Argument in Criminal Trial