Abstract:Research background: Issuing an annual report inquiry letter is a powerful means by which securities exchanges regulate the information of listed companies, which can convey information, reveal risks, and sustain the orderly development of capital markets. However, research on the economic consequences is limited. Purpose of the article: This study analyses the relationships and mechanisms between annual report inquiry letters, key audit matters (KAMs), and audit fees. Methods: We collected data from Chinese A-share companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges between 2017 and 2022, totalling 9,903 observations. We used Stata to conduct mediation effects and heterogeneity tests on the data. We also conducted further research on the relationship between audit fees and the purchase of audit opinions. Findings & value added: The results indicate that (1) companies that receive annual report inquiry letters have higher audit fees. Furthermore, (2) companies that receive annual report inquiry letters are more likely to increase the number of disclosed KAMs, leading to higher audit fees. Finally, (3) the above relationship is more significant amongst companies audited by non-Big-Four accounting firms than amongst those audited by Big-Four accounting firms. Further, the increase in audit fees for the sample companies is not due to the purchase of audit opinions and is combined with robustness tests, further validating the conclusions of this study. These findings contribute to research on the economic impact of implementing the annual report inquiry system and new auditing standards, providing empirical evidence for the effectiveness of government oversight of capital markets.

Legal infrastructure construction and audit opinion: Evidence from the implementation of China's new securities law

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Legal Liability, Government Intervention, and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from Structural Reform of Audit Firms in China

Informativeness of the Expanded Audit Report: Evidence from China

The Legal Environments, Audit Quality and Initial Return——Evidence from Chinese SOEs

Can Enforcement Actions on Engagement Auditors Improve Audit Quality?

Individual Auditor Social Responsibility and Audit Quality: Evidence from China

Incentives for Auditor Independence: An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Formal Sanctions in China

Auditor Legal Liability and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Organizational Transformation of Chinese Audit Firms

The accountability system for operation and investment and audit quality of state-owned enterprises

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Does securities enforcement improve disclosure quality? An examination of Chinese listed companies' restatement activities

Do Regulations Limiting Management Influence over Auditors Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from China

The effect of enforcement action on audit fees and the audit reporting lag

Special representative actions, the insurance value of audits, and investor protection: an empirical study based on the ruling against Kangmei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd

Audit Opinion Improvement and the Timing of Disclosure

Corporate Fraud and Accounting Firm Involvement: Evidence from China

Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China