Abstract:This study investigates the impact of sanctions on corporate reporting behaviour, encompassing both financial and sustainability reporting. Utilising comprehensive data from the Global Sanctions Database (GSDB), the study reveals an asymmetrical effect of sanctions on corporate reporting behaviours. Specifically, our findings reveal a negative relationship between sanctions and earnings management, suggesting a more conservative and transparent approach to financial reporting during sanction periods. However, the relationship between sanctions and the quality of sustainability reporting is significantly negative, indicating a decline in sustainability reporting quality during times of sanctions. Furthermore, the study provides evidence that EU sanctions have a stronger influence on both types of reporting compared to US sanctions. The results also break down the effects of each type of sanction on corporate reporting, indicating that financial and trade sanctions have a significant impact, while military and other types of sanctions do not show a significant effect. Drawing from signalling theory, corporate reports serve to signal stakeholders about a firm's behaviour and alleviate the information asymmetry between managers and other stakeholders. Consequently, our study contributes to signalling theory by illustrating that distinct signals are conveyed through different reports during uncertain periods, such as sanctions.

The effect of enforcement action on audit fees and the audit reporting lag

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Incentives for Auditor Independence: An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Formal Sanctions in China

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

On Factors Affecting the Penalties of Audit Firms by Regulatory Authority: Evidence from Auditing Regulation of Capital Markets in China

The Effect of Auditing on Promoting Exports: Evidence from Private Firms in Emerging Markets

Do Sanctioned Audit Firms Strive to Restore Their Damaged Reputation under Imperfect Institutional Settings?

Accounting Fraud, Auditing, and the Role of Government Sanctions in China

Corporate Fraud and Accounting Firm Involvement: Evidence from China

Changes in Auditor–Client Engagements after the Auditor is Penalized

Do Regulations Limiting Management Influence over Auditors Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from China

Effects of Auditing Fee on Auditing Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

The Auditors’ Reaction to the Companies’ Accounting and Financial Irregularities——Analysis of the punishment bulletins of the CRSC,SSE,and SZSE

The effect of financial reporting regimes on audit report lags and audit fees: evidence from firms cross-listed in the USA

Regulated Changes in Audit Fee Disclosure and Improvement of Audit Environment:Evidence from China's Auditing Market

Did the SEC administrative proceedings against Chinese auditors affect audit quality?

The Influence of Sanctions on Corporate Reporting Behaviour: International Evidence

The Effect of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Hong Kong

Special representative actions, the insurance value of audits, and investor protection: an empirical study based on the ruling against Kangmei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd

Does securities enforcement improve disclosure quality? An examination of Chinese listed companies' restatement activities