Abstract:Companies facing serious financial distress are more likely to engage in income-increasing earnings management than healthy firms in order to mask poor performance. In these contexts, audit firms might increase substantive tests, that should constrain discretionary accruals, as well as charging risk premiums, both resulting in growing audit fees. The different components of audit fees, namely a fee premium for auditors’ efforts or risk premium, however, have an opposing impact on audit quality. This paper aims thus to investigate how the business context status of a client might differently affect the auditors’ pricing policies and commitments in the audit process. We address our research questions adopting a matched sample consisting of bankrupt and healthy US firms in the post-SOX period, between 2005 and 2015. Consistent with our predictions, the results show a significant propensity of ex-post bankrupt firms to adopt upward earnings management. In these critical contexts, it reveals that auditors are primarily concerned about obtaining a risk premium, especially in the first year of an engagement, rather than extending the audit efforts to constrain earnings manipulation. By contrast, the higher audit fees charged to healthy companies by the newly appointed auditors result in effective audit efforts, therefore improving the earnings quality. This study thus provides evidence that in riskier business contexts auditors prefer conservative approaches to pro-active commitments by primarily adjusting risk premiums in response to a higher litigation risk. The paper contributes to the extant literature by documenting the existence of a component in the audit fees that results in low audit quality.

Changes in Auditor–Client Engagements after the Auditor is Penalized

Auditors under Fire: the Association Between Audit Errors and the Career Setbacks of Individual Auditors

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

The effect of enforcement action on audit fees and the audit reporting lag

Auditor Competencies, Organizational Learning, and Audit Quality: Spillover Effects of Auditing Cross-Listed Clients

Corporate Fraud and Accounting Firm Involvement: Evidence from China

Incentives for Auditor Independence: An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Formal Sanctions in China

Do Auditors Learn from Stock Prices of Their Clients? Evidence from Audit Adjustments of Pre-audited Earnings

Legal Liability, Government Intervention, and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from Structural Reform of Audit Firms in China

Unintended Consequences from Downward Audit Adjustments: Evidence from China

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

Effects of Auditing Fee on Auditing Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

On Factors Affecting the Penalties of Audit Firms by Regulatory Authority: Evidence from Auditing Regulation of Capital Markets in China

Do Sanctioned Audit Firms Strive to Restore Their Damaged Reputation under Imperfect Institutional Settings?

The Auditors’ Reaction to the Companies’ Accounting and Financial Irregularities——Analysis of the punishment bulletins of the CRSC,SSE,and SZSE

Do Auditors Shift the Weight on Performance Indicators to More Favorable Measures?

Audit outcomes of non‐financial misconduct

Exogenous Loss of Analyst Coverage and Choice of Audit Quality

Restoring Trust among Investors after Shredded CPA Reputation: Evidence from China

Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality, The Impact of Business Context on Auditors' Priorities