Abstract:There is mixed evidence in the literature on the effect of audit errors and deficiencies uncovered through regulatory action or private litigation on the auditor’s subsequent engagements. Although audit errors can be indicative of low-quality work, they can also serve as a credible indicator of auditor learning through experimentation (usually referred to as active learning) about the location of the imprecisely defined boundary between acceptable and unacceptable accounting treatments and therefore possessing superior expertise that cannot be acquired through other means. Using unique data available in China, we test the hypotheses derived from the above opposing views and find that our results are more consistent with the active learning explanation. The results show that, after an auditor is penalized for performing supposedly flawed work for a client, the auditor’s other listed clients prepare higher-quality pre-audit financial statements and approve larger audit adjustments, while the auditor expends fewer audit hours and charges lower audit fees. Furthermore, the quality of post-audit financial statements improves. Our results highlight the importance of considering moral hazard and active learning simultaneously when studying auditor–client interactions and support the new explanation we propose for the inconsistent results reported in prior research.

Incentives for Auditor Independence: An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Formal Sanctions in China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

The effect of enforcement action on audit fees and the audit reporting lag

MARKET COMPETITION,MANAGER INCENTIVE,AND FRAUD BEHAVIOR OF LISTED COMPANIES——EVIDENCE FROM PUNISHMENT BULLETINS BY CSRC

Do Sanctioned Audit Firms Strive to Restore Their Damaged Reputation under Imperfect Institutional Settings?

Accounting Fraud, Auditing, and the Role of Government Sanctions in China

The Effect of Auditing on Promoting Exports: Evidence from Private Firms in Emerging Markets

Corporate Fraud and Accounting Firm Involvement: Evidence from China

Auditors under Fire: the Association Between Audit Errors and the Career Setbacks of Individual Auditors

On Factors Affecting the Penalties of Audit Firms by Regulatory Authority: Evidence from Auditing Regulation of Capital Markets in China

The Auditors’ Reaction to the Companies’ Accounting and Financial Irregularities——Analysis of the punishment bulletins of the CRSC,SSE,and SZSE

Do Regulations Limiting Management Influence over Auditors Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from China

Changes in Auditor–Client Engagements after the Auditor is Penalized

Corporate Violations and Audit Opinions: Warning Effect or Uncovering Effect?

Do Auditors Consider Alleged Bribery when Accepting Clients? Evidence from Chinese Non-State-owned Enterprises

A Re-examination of the Auditor Independence in China

Buy, Lie, or Die: an Investigation of Chinese ST Firms’ Voluntary Interim Audit Motive and Auditor Independence

Does securities enforcement improve disclosure quality? An examination of Chinese listed companies' restatement activities

Special representative actions, the insurance value of audits, and investor protection: an empirical study based on the ruling against Kangmei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd

Legal Liability, Government Intervention, and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from Structural Reform of Audit Firms in China