Abstract:The complementary principle (CR) is the most practical method for estimating regional evaporation ( E ) based only on routine meteorological observations. However, CR-based models have certain problems that must be solved for widespread application, such as the influence of wind function types and parameterization. In this study, the generalized CR with polynomial forms (GCR) as a case study is applied to investigate the influences of two different parameterization schemes of wind function—the Penman wind function ( f PM ) and theoretical wind function ( f SM )—on evaporation estimation. The observed daily E values from nine eddy flux stations in Australia with contrasting climates and land cover types were collected to quantify the influences. The results showed that the GCR successfully estimated the E value of flux stations with both the f PM and f SM , and the E value estimated with f SM was more sensitive to wind speed than that with f PM . The estimated aerodynamic term ( E A ), estimated evaporation error ( E error ), and parameter α c showed marked differences between the two wind functions. The E A-SM (hereafter, subscripts PM and SM represent the wind function type) is approximately 1.05- to 5.06-fold greater than the E A-PM across stations, with a mean of 2.60 ± 1.33 (mean ± standard deviation). The correlation between E error-SM with wind speed ( u ) was positive with an average slope of 0.19, while that of f SM was negative with an average slope of −0.13. The difference in the calibrated parameter of the GCR (i.e., α c ) between the two wind functions varied site-to-site, ranging from 0.02 to 0.31. This study highlights that both wind function parameterization schemes successfully estimate regional evaporation, but highly differed in evaporation components, errors, and parameter. These results can help to understand and adopt proper wind parameterization schemes for wider applications of GCR method. Additional studies are required to generalize the spatial variability of different wind function parameters and their influence on the applicability of the GCR.

Comment on "Comparison of the Efficiencies of the Prognostic Generalized Complementary Functions on Evaporation Estimation" by Wang, L., et al., Published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Investigating the influences of wind function parameterization on evaporation estimation using the generalized complementary principle

Sigmoid generalized complementary equation for evaporation over wet surfaces: A nonlinear modification of the Priestley–Taylor equation

Revisiting the global distribution of the exponent of the power-function complementary relationship of terrestrial evaporation: Insights from an isenthalpic index

A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions

Can the atmospheric boundary layer-based potential evaporation model increase the accuracy of generalized complementary functions?

Reply to Comment on “potential Evaporation and the Complementary Relationship” by Jozsef Szilagyi

Derivation of a Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Function for Evaporation with Physical Constraints

Complementary principle of evaporation: From original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions

Reply to Comment on "on the Estimation of Potential Evaporation under Wet and Dry Conditions" by Jozsef Szilagyi

Comment on Two Papers about the Generalized Complementary Evaporation Relationships by Crago Et Al.

Comment on the paper "Generalized dynamic equations related to condensation and freezing processes" by Wang and Huang (2018)

Comparison of formulating apparent potential evaporation with pan measurements and Penman methods

Potential Evaporation and the Complementary Relationship

Determinants of the Asymmetric Parameter in the Generalized Complementary Principle of Evaporation

Should Two-Parameter Generalized Complementary Models for Evaporation Be Simplified to Single-Parameter? A Pairwise Evaluation over Grassland and Forest Sites

Improvement in the blending the evaporation precipitation ratio with complementary principle function for daily evaporation estimation

An Evaporation Correction Approach and Its Characteristics

Evaluation of Potential Evapotranspiration Based on CMADS Reanalysis Dataset over China

Interactive comment on "Does evaporation paradox exist in China?" by Z. T. Cong and D. W. Yang

A Nonlinear Function Approach for the Normalized Complementary Relationship Evaporation Model