Abstract:Actual evapotranspiration constitutes a vital component of the exchange of energy and water vapour between the soil‐vegetation and atmospheric systems on terrestrial terrain. Nevertheless, the Tibetan Plateau, owing to its austere environmental conditions, harbours a scarcity of terrestrial monitoring stations. This circumstance presents a formidable challenge in attaining precise estimations of actual evapotranspiration. The complementary relationship method is a potential approach because it requires only routine meteorological data to estimate actual evapotranspiration on a regional or global scale. However, the suitability of the complementary relationship model across diverse ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau necessitates further investigation. In this study, we scrutinized the simulation of daily and monthly actual evapotranspiration across 18 observation sites spanning eight distinct land use categories on the Tibetan Plateau. We employed the polynomial generalized complementary function introduced by Brutsaert (B2015), alongside its enhanced rendition proposed by Szilagyi (S2017) and Crago (C2018). The outcomes reveal that all three models adeptly replicate the fluctuations in actual evapotranspiration, irrespective of land use category or temporal scale—whether daily or monthly. This is true regardless of whether original or calibrated parameter values are applied. However, there exist significant variations in the performance of these models. In general, the C2018 model demonstrates superior performance across most ecosystems when original parameters are employed. Following parameter calibration, the simulation efficacy of the models experienced marked enhancement. Post parameter calibration, the B2015 model outperforms the other two models notably in desert and wetland environments. Furthermore, the simulation outputs from all three models display heightened sensitivity to parameter α, particularly in the context of the C2018 and S2017 models. These findings suggest that accurate estimation of parameter values is critical to improving the accuracy of estimating actual evapotranspiration. Calibrated parameter values, contingent on a fusion of vegetation, meteorology and surface roughness, exhibit variability across diverse ecosystems.

A Complementary Relationship Evaporation Model Referring to the Granger Model and the Advection-Aridity Model

A Nonlinear Function Approach for the Normalized Complementary Relationship Evaporation Model

Extending the Integrated Richards Equation Method to New Boundary Conditions: Model Description and Validation

Should Two-Parameter Generalized Complementary Models for Evaporation Be Simplified to Single-Parameter? A Pairwise Evaluation over Grassland and Forest Sites

Contrasting Land and Atmospheric Controls on the Generalized Complementary Relationship of Evaporation Over Grasslands and Forests

Potential Evaporation and the Complementary Relationship

Complementary principle of evaporation: From original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions

Integration of Penman Approach with Complementary Principle for Evaporation Research

A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions

Evaluation of Applicability of Three Evapotranspiration Models Using Meteorological Data

Evaluating the advection-aridity model of evaporation using data from field-sized surfaces of HEIFE

Seasonal variability of the complementary relationship in the Asian monsoon region

Estimation of actual evapotranspiration from different ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau based on a generalized complementary evapotranspiration theory model

Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Equation for Wet Surface Evaporation at the Scale with Changing Advections

Derivation of a Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Function for Evaporation with Physical Constraints

Sigmoid generalized complementary equation for evaporation over wet surfaces: A nonlinear modification of the Priestley–Taylor equation

Can the atmospheric boundary layer-based potential evaporation model increase the accuracy of generalized complementary functions?

Reply to Comment on “potential Evaporation and the Complementary Relationship” by Jozsef Szilagyi

Improvement in the blending the evaporation precipitation ratio with complementary principle function for daily evaporation estimation

Estimating water surface evaporation losses under floating coverage: Modeling and Application

Variability of complementary relationship and its mechanism on different time scales