Abstract:The complementary principle (CR) is the most practical method for estimating regional evaporation ( E ) based only on routine meteorological observations. However, CR-based models have certain problems that must be solved for widespread application, such as the influence of wind function types and parameterization. In this study, the generalized CR with polynomial forms (GCR) as a case study is applied to investigate the influences of two different parameterization schemes of wind function—the Penman wind function ( f PM ) and theoretical wind function ( f SM )—on evaporation estimation. The observed daily E values from nine eddy flux stations in Australia with contrasting climates and land cover types were collected to quantify the influences. The results showed that the GCR successfully estimated the E value of flux stations with both the f PM and f SM , and the E value estimated with f SM was more sensitive to wind speed than that with f PM . The estimated aerodynamic term ( E A ), estimated evaporation error ( E error ), and parameter α c showed marked differences between the two wind functions. The E A-SM (hereafter, subscripts PM and SM represent the wind function type) is approximately 1.05- to 5.06-fold greater than the E A-PM across stations, with a mean of 2.60 ± 1.33 (mean ± standard deviation). The correlation between E error-SM with wind speed ( u ) was positive with an average slope of 0.19, while that of f SM was negative with an average slope of −0.13. The difference in the calibrated parameter of the GCR (i.e., α c ) between the two wind functions varied site-to-site, ranging from 0.02 to 0.31. This study highlights that both wind function parameterization schemes successfully estimate regional evaporation, but highly differed in evaporation components, errors, and parameter. These results can help to understand and adopt proper wind parameterization schemes for wider applications of GCR method. Additional studies are required to generalize the spatial variability of different wind function parameters and their influence on the applicability of the GCR.

Complementary principle of evaporation: From original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions

A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions

A Nonlinear Function Approach for the Normalized Complementary Relationship Evaporation Model

Derivation of a Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Function for Evaporation with Physical Constraints

Integration of Penman Approach with Complementary Principle for Evaporation Research

Sigmoid generalized complementary equation for evaporation over wet surfaces: A nonlinear modification of the Priestley–Taylor equation

Extending the Integrated Richards Equation Method to New Boundary Conditions: Model Description and Validation

Application of Complementary Algorithm for Solving One-Dimensional Nonlinear Consolidation

At which timescale does the complementary principle perform best in evaporation estimation?

Potential Evaporation and the Complementary Relationship

Can the atmospheric boundary layer-based potential evaporation model increase the accuracy of generalized complementary functions?

Should Two-Parameter Generalized Complementary Models for Evaporation Be Simplified to Single-Parameter? A Pairwise Evaluation over Grassland and Forest Sites

Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Equation for Wet Surface Evaporation at the Scale with Changing Advections

A Complementary Relationship Evaporation Model Referring to the Granger Model and the Advection-Aridity Model

Contrasting Land and Atmospheric Controls on the Generalized Complementary Relationship of Evaporation Over Grasslands and Forests

Determinants of the Asymmetric Parameter in the Generalized Complementary Principle of Evaporation

Investigating the influences of wind function parameterization on evaporation estimation using the generalized complementary principle

Reply to Comment by J. Szilagyi and R. Crago on “derivation of a Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Function for Evaporation with Physical Constraints”

Comment on Two Papers about the Generalized Complementary Evaporation Relationships by Crago Et Al.

Improvement in the blending the evaporation precipitation ratio with complementary principle function for daily evaporation estimation

Comment on "Comparison of the Efficiencies of the Prognostic Generalized Complementary Functions on Evaporation Estimation" by Wang, L., et al., Published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres