Abstract:The main purpose of this study is to evaluate evaporation estimation methods for water surfaces under floating coverage in arid areas. The natural water surface evaporation methods (namely, the mass transfer method (MT), Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) method, Penman method, the Penman-Monteith method (PM), and the Priestley-Taylor method (PT)) are corrected to establish the covered water surface evaporation methods, which are based on the micrometeorology near the covered water surface, energy balance components, and Bowen ratio. The radiation term of the natural water surface evaporation model is corrected by introducing the Bowen ratio of the entire surface, which includes the uncovered water surface and the floating cover surface. The mass transfer coefficient and aerodynamic impedance in the aerodynamic terms of the natural water surface evaporation model were corrected. Taking the evaporation of the water surface covered by spheres (coverage rate of spheres is 76.4%) as an example, based on the rose change characteristics of the above parameters, the effects of these modified evaporation models are comprehensively evaluated from three different time scales (even months, odd months and the complete test period). The evaluation methods include the root mean square error (RMSE), index of agreement (D), mean bias error (MBE), and coefficient of determination (R-2). The results show that under three different time scales, the Penman-Monteith model is the most promising and superior in estimating water surface evaporation under floating coverage (for the complete test period, RMSE=0.11 mm.d(-1), D=0.99, MBE= 0.07 mm.d(-1), and R-2 =0.99); the Priestley-Taylor model is slightly less effective in estimating evaporation than the Penman-Monteith model, and the mass transfer model and the Penman model are less effective in estimating evaporation. Furthermore, the analysis of the Penman-Monteith model shows that the evaporation of the radiation term (69.5%) is higher than that of the aerodynamic term (30.5%) during the evaporation of the water surface under floating coverage, while the evaporation of the radiation term is dominant. Moreover, during the complete test period, the weights of the radiation evaporation and aerodynamic evaporation changed significantly with time. The proportion of radiation evaporation varies from 54.8% to 81.7%, while that of aerodynamic evaporation varies from 18.3% to 45.2%.

Integration of Penman Approach with Complementary Principle for Evaporation Research

Complementary principle of evaporation: From original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions

Extending the Integrated Richards Equation Method to New Boundary Conditions: Model Description and Validation

A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions

Derivation of a Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Function for Evaporation with Physical Constraints

Sigmoid generalized complementary equation for evaporation over wet surfaces: A nonlinear modification of the Priestley–Taylor equation

Penman and Priestley-Taylor Approaches in Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Dynamics

A Nonlinear Function Approach for the Normalized Complementary Relationship Evaporation Model

Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Equation for Wet Surface Evaporation at the Scale with Changing Advections

Potential Evaporation and the Complementary Relationship

Comparison of formulating apparent potential evaporation with pan measurements and Penman methods

Interpreting the complementary relationship in non-humid environments based on the Budyko and Penman hypotheses

Should Two-Parameter Generalized Complementary Models for Evaporation Be Simplified to Single-Parameter? A Pairwise Evaluation over Grassland and Forest Sites

A Complementary Relationship Evaporation Model Referring to the Granger Model and the Advection-Aridity Model

Determinants of the Asymmetric Parameter in the Generalized Complementary Principle of Evaporation

An Evaporation Correction Approach and Its Characteristics

Contrasting Land and Atmospheric Controls on the Generalized Complementary Relationship of Evaporation Over Grasslands and Forests

Improvement in the blending the evaporation precipitation ratio with complementary principle function for daily evaporation estimation

Comparison of Evaporation Estimation Methods for Water Surface under Floating Coverage in Arid Areas

On the Estimation of Potential Evaporation under Wet and Dry Conditions

Investigating the influences of wind function parameterization on evaporation estimation using the generalized complementary principle