Abstract:Potential evapotranspiration depends greatly on local climate and vegetation distribution conditions,and is important in studying the cropland and basin hydrological circles.The current study provides a detailed comparison of the performances among three dual-source evapotranspiration models,including the layer model,the patch model and the hybrid model,in estimating and partitioning potential evaporation and potential transpiration under different hypothetical vegetation distribution conditions.The layer model ignores the difference of energy fluxes between under-and inter-canopy soil;while the patch approach assumes a full radiation loading for both the canopy and inter-canopy soil and ignores the evaporation from under-canopy soil surfaces;The hybrid model is a combination of the layer and patch models,and adopts the layer approach to partition available energy between canopy and soil and uses the patch approach to calculate energy fluxes.As a result,both under-and inter-canopy soil evaporation were estimated and distinguished in the hybrid model.In simulation scenarios,the height of vegetation was assumed to be 5 m with canopy leaf area index of 2 and minimum stomatal resistance of 170 s/m.The bulk surface leaf area index(LAI) varied from 0.5 to 5,and fractional vegetation coverage(Fr) varied from 10% to 100%.The vegetation clumpy patterns were quantified by fixing LAI while varying Fr.The climate data was obtained from the Linhe meteorological station located in an arid region in central Inner Mongolia of North China.The results indicated that both the patch and hybrid model performed reasonably well in estimating potential evapotranspiration under homogeneous vegetation distribution conditions.However,the layer model tended to overestimate potential evapotranspiration,as it generally gave higher potential evaporation estimates.The overestimation in potential evapotranspiration by the layer model was increased with the increase of Fr and the decrease of LAI.On the contrary,the patch model had a tendency to underestimate potential evaporation,especially with high Fr and low LAI.For heterogeneous vegetation distribution conditions,potential evapotranspiration estimated from the layer model was generally higher than that given by the patch and hybrid model,particularly with low Fr.Potential evaporation(potential transpiration) from the layer model increases(decreases) with the increase of LAI.However,both variables from the layer model did not change with changes of Fr.In contrast,potential transpiration estimated from the patch and hybrid model was increased with the increase of both LAI and Fr.Potential evaporation from the patch model was increased with the increase of Fr,but kept relative constant under various LAI conditions,while potential evaporation from the hybrid model was increased with the decrease of both Fr and LAI.The above results suggest that the layer model may give reasonable potential transpiration estimates over homogeneous vegetated surfaces,while the patch model is more suitable for surfaces with lower fractional and clumped vegetation cover.By contrast,the hybrid model performs better than both the layer model and the patch model,which can be used to estimate potential evaporation and potential transpiration partitioning for a wide range of surfaces with different vegetation distribution patterns.

Evaluation of Applicability of Three Evapotranspiration Models Using Meteorological Data

Appropriateness of Potential Evapotranspiration Models for Climate Change Impact Analysis in Yarlung Zangbo River Basin, China

Evaluation and Hydrological Application of Precipitation Estimates Derived from PERSIANN‐CDR, TRMM 3B42V7, and NCEP‐CFSR over Humid Regions in China

Changes in Actual Evapotranspiration and Its Dominant Drivers Across the Three-River Source Region of China During 1982–2014

Comparison of the three-temperature model and conventional models for estimating transpiration

A Complementary Relationship Evaporation Model Referring to the Granger Model and the Advection-Aridity Model

Comparison of dual-source evapotranspiration models in estimating potential evaporation and transpiration

Comparison of Seven Models for Estimation of Evapotranspiration and Groundwater Recharge Using Lysimeter Measurement Data in Germany

Research on methods for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration under incomplete meteorological indicators

Characteristics of Modelling Hourly Water Surface Evaporation in Lake Taihu and Comparison of Simulation Results by Three Models

Estimation of actual evapotranspiration from different ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau based on a generalized complementary evapotranspiration theory model

Simple and Applicable Method for Estimating Evapotranspiration and Its Components in Arid Regions

Integrating Temperature Gradient-Based 3T and Resistance-Based Models for Simulating Evapotranspiration and Its Components

Comparison of three dual-source remote sensing evapotranspiration models during the MUSOEXE-12 campaign: Revisit of model physics: Two-source remote sensing ET model comparision

Estimating the Temporal and Spatial Variations in Evapotranspiration with a Nonlinear Evaporation Complementary Relationship Model in Hyper-arid Areas

The Three-Temperature Model to Estimate Evapotranspiration and Its Partitioning at Multiple Scales: A Review

Applicability of two-source potential evapotranspiration model in semiarid areas

Comparative evaluation of four actual evapotranspiration models over different ecosystems and climate zones in China

Intercomparison of Three Two-Source Energy Balance Models for Partitioning Evaporation and Transpiration in Semiarid Climates

Influences of Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods on SWAT's Hydrologic Simulation in a Northwestern Minnesota Watershed

Utilizing Machine Learning Models with Limited Meteorological Data as Alternatives for the FAO-56PM Model in Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration