Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics and Different Calculation Methods for the Key Parameter <i>α</i><sub>e</sub> in the Generalized Complementary Principle of Evapotranspiration

Ying Huang,Zhi Chen,Z.B. Shi,Bowen Xiong,Chun-Hua YAN,Guoyu Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17521/cjpe.2021.0292
2022-01-01
Abstract:Aims The generalized complementary principle of evapotranspiration is one of the important methods to estimate evapotranspiration when the observed data are scarce.In implementing this method, an accurate estimation of parameter α e is critical.The temporal and spatial variation of α e and the applicability of different methods for calculating α e were investigated at eight flux stations under different climatic conditions and ecosystem types in China.Methods Firstly, the annual and monthly values of α e were calibrated based on the measured data.The spatiotemporal variability of α e was investigated and the influence of α e with different temporal scales on the calculation accuracy of the generalized complementarity principle model were compared.Considering that α e can not be calibrated without measured evapotranspiration data, the applicability of two statistical models of annual α e values based on aridity index (AI)(Liu method and Brutsaert method) were evaluated to determine whether α e can be determined using AI.Finally, the error sources of each calculation method were analyzed.Important findings α e value varies with season, and the monthly variations of α e differ among different flux stations.In terms of spatial variation, the annual values of α e at humid sites were larger than those at arid sites.The α e calculated by Liu method and Brutsaert method were close to the calibrated values.In applying the generalized complementary principle model, high simulation accuracy can be achieved by using the calibrated annual α e , and the accuracy can be further improved by using the monthly α e .Two AI-based methods also achieved accurate
What problem does this paper attempt to address?