Abstract:At the eve of the reorganization of the Netherlands Judiciary which led to fully responsible boards of the courts and a council for the Judiciary, in 1998 an inventory was made of bottle necks in the performance of the courts, as perceived by their users, and the gains for society of removing these bottlenecks were calculated in economic terms. Conceptually as well as from the perspective of data availability, this was not an easy undertaking. Now fifteen years later, it is of interest to evaluate whether the bottlenecks were solved and the then calculated gains reached. This paper reports the outcome of this evaluation with respect to civil and administrative cases. It shows that substantial progress was made, for instance, by reducing court delay and that a large part of the previously calculated gains was realized. But it also shows that the demands of society have increased further about timeliness, and, in particular, about digital access of the courts. And again substantial gains are possible and necessary. Within the Netherlands Judiciary it was recently concluded that these improvements require redesign of the laws of procedure to make procedures less formal and much faster, but also demand radical digitalization. As to the methodological aspects, the knowledge about the impact of the judicial function on the welfare of society is growing. However, the assessment of the economic impact of specific improvements such as reduction of court delay, let alone improved reasoning and consistency of judicial decisions, is still rare. The paper discusses possibilities and complications. While it is feasible to assess the direct gains to the parties in a court procedure, the gains resulting from a more effective "shadow of the law" due to the quicker and more predictable adjudication of cases are still elusive.

Mandatory Retirement for Judges Improved the Performance of US State Supreme Courts

Judicial Decision Making under Changing Legal Standards: the Case of Dismissal Arbitration

Judicial Career Incentives and Court Performance: An Empirical Study of the German Labour Courts of Appeal

Estimates of Regulatory Interventions in Dismissal Dispute Decisions

Judicial Independence and Corporate Employment: Evidence from China

Does Judge Turnover Affect Judicial Performance? Evidence from Italian Court Records

The Precipitous Decline in Reasoning and Other Key Abilities with Age and Its Implications for Federal Judges

Judging Judicial Review in the American States

Politics , the Judiciary , and the Arbitration of Unfair Dismissal Disputes

Education legislations that equalize: a study of compulsory schooling law reforms in post-WWII United States

Does the appointment of judges increase the output of the judiciary?

Dismissal Laws in Australia: Reforms and Enforcement by Labour Courts

Improved performance of the Netherlands Judiciary: Assessment Of The Gains For Society

Courts, Crime and Economic Performance: Evidence from a Judicial Reform in Kenya

The impact of retirement on health: Empirical evidence from the change in public pensionable age in Japan

Self‐Efficacy, Prosocial Impact, and Self‐Legitimacy as Psychological Predictors of Judicial Officer Performance

A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload

The Effects of Delayed Mandatory Retirement on Elderly and Youth Employment

Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts

Federal judge ideology and real earnings management

The Effect of an Increase of the Retirement Age on the Health, Well-Being, and Labor Force Participation of Older Workers: a Systematic Literature Review