Abstract:This paper investigates whether and how managers of highly polluting firms adjust their earnings forecast behaviors in response to the introduction of environmental legal institutions. Using the establishment of environmental courts in China as a quasi-natural experiment, our triple difference-in-differences (DID) estimation shows that environmental courts significantly increase the likelihood of management earnings forecasts for highly polluting firms, compared to non-highly polluting firms. This association becomes more pronounced for firms with stronger monitoring power, higher environmental litigation risk, and greater earnings uncertainty. Additionally, we show that highly polluting firms improve the precision and accuracy of their management earnings forecasts following the establishment of environmental courts. Furthermore, we provide evidence that our results do not support the opportunistic perspective that suggests managers strategically issue more positive earnings forecasts to inflate stakeholders' expectations subsequent to the implementation of environmental courts. Overall, our research indicates that environmental legal institutions make firms with greater environmental concerns to provide more forward-looking information, thereby alleviating stakeholders' apprehensions regarding future profitability prospects.

Judicial Independence and Corporate Employment: Evidence from China

Judicial Independence, Local Protectionism, and Economic Integration: Evidence from China

Judicial institutional design and corporate litigation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China

Environmental judicial independence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Does legal justice promote stakeholder justice? Evidence from a judicial reform in China

Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts 1

Corporate Endowment Insurance Fee Reduction and Employee Wages:Evidence from China

THE EVOLUTION OF GUANXI DYNAMICS IN THE CHINESE LEGAL SYSTEM: A PERSPECTIVE OF CAREER MOBILITY

Fair and square: The impact of judicial independence on entrepreneurship

Suing the Government under Weak Rule of Law: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

Suing the Government under Independent Jurisdiction: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

Environmental judicial reform and corporate investment behavior - Based on a quasi-natural experiment of environmental courts

Board Independence, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance - Chinese Evidence

Stock Market Liberalization and Corporate Investment Revisited: Evidence from China

Do environmental courts break collusion in environmental governance? Evidence from corporate green innovation in China

Employment protection and environmental corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China

Environmental legal institutions and management earnings forecasts: Evidence from the establishment of environmental courts in China

Monitoring Courts: A Top-down or Grassroots Approach?

Corporate Governance of Controlling Shareholders and Labor Employment Decisions: Evidence from a Parent Board Reform in China

Executive Compensation and Legal Investor Protection: Evidence from China'S Listed Firms

Bank liability structure and corporate employment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China