Abstract:Judicial improvement and trade structure optimization are important elements in achieving a high level of openness. This paper develops a theoretical framework on the impact of local protectionism on market integration and export technical complexity, and then empirically analyses the effect of judicial improvement on the technical complexity of urban product exports and its mechanism of action based on a quasi-natural experiment with the establishment of circuit courts. The study finds that the establishment of circuit courts significantly increases the technical complexity of product exports, and the findings remain valid after a series of robustness tests. Further analysis shows that the technology enhancement effect of the establishment of circuit courts is more pronounced in the group of cities with higher administrative levels, better location advantages, and less advanced rule of law. Mechanism Analysis shows that a superior institutional environment can have a two-sided effect on different types of firms. Overall, however, the productivity-enhancing effect of low-productivity firms exiting the market is lower than the productivity-reducing effect of higher-productivity firms’ increased compliance costs, which in turn weakens the positive promotional effect of circuit courts. The above theoretical and empirical findings provide policy implications for maximizing the technology enhancement effect of the establishment of circuit courts on product exports, thereby promoting a high level of openness in China.

Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts 1

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

Fair and square: The impact of judicial independence on entrepreneurship

Judicial institutional design and corporate litigation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China

Does legal justice promote stakeholder justice? Evidence from a judicial reform in China

Intellectual property judicial protection, innovation factor input, and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of intellectual property courts in China

Judicial Independence and Corporate Employment: Evidence from China

Judicial improvement, market integration, and export technical complexity-a quasi-natural experiments based on the creation of circuit courts

Do environmental courts break collusion in environmental governance? Evidence from corporate green innovation in China

Environmental judicial independence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Judicial Independence, Local Protectionism, and Economic Integration: Evidence from China

The rule of law strengthening on corporate green innovation: a quasi-natural experiment based on the establishment of environmental courts in China

Judicial informatization and digital transformation: evidence from the establishment of the internet court

Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Firm Innovation: Evidence from Half Million Firms in China

The impact of judicial protection of intellectual property on digital innovation: Evidence from China

Monitoring Courts: A Top-down or Grassroots Approach?

Environmental judicial reform and corporate investment behavior - Based on a quasi-natural experiment of environmental courts

Does Property Rights Protection Affect Firm Innovation? Evidence from the Chinese Property Rights Law Enactment

The impact of patent infringement litigation decisions on firms' innovation performance in China

Historical Institution and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China's Civil-Service Examination