Abstract:This paper establishes the presence of political corruption in court and identifies a novel channel—interfering with court decisions—through which local corrupt politicians provide political favors for politically connected firms. Using a unique data set of 11,238 commercial lawsuits involving Chinese listed firms, we examine how China's recent anti-corruption campaign, one of whose goals is to combat political interference in the courts, affects court advantages of politically connected firms. We find that connected firms' win rates dropped by 6.3% after the anti-corruption, suggesting that the campaign stopped corrupt politicians transferring 1.8% of total monetary amounts of commercial disputes from unconnected to politically connected parties by influencing trials. The effect is more salient for firms connected to more powerful officials, noncontract-based cases, lower-level courts, regions with weak legal environments, and courts that depend more on local government. Moreover, anti-corruption promotes a better judicial environment, not only improves the quality of judicial decisions, but also boosts public confidence in the judicial system, and encourages firms to settle conflicts through court. Finally, we explore the campaign's broader economic influences and find that after the campaign, cities with initially poorly functioning judiciaries gained more investment, employed more labor, produced more output, and attracted more new firms, particularly in those industries with high contract intensity. Overall, the anti-corruption campaign significantly improved the judicial and economic environment in China.

Fair and square: The impact of judicial independence on entrepreneurship

Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts 1

Judicial Independence, Local Protectionism, and Economic Integration: Evidence from China

Judicial Independence and Corporate Employment: Evidence from China

Does legal justice promote stakeholder justice? Evidence from a judicial reform in China

Judicial improvement, market integration, and export technical complexity-a quasi-natural experiments based on the creation of circuit courts

The Establishment of Circuit Courts and Corporate Fraud

Judicial institutional design and corporate litigation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China

Monitoring Courts: A Top-down or Grassroots Approach?

Environmental judicial independence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Suing the Government under Weak Rule of Law: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

Deregulation and Employee Entrepreneurship: Evidence from the Patent Law Industry in China

Anti-corruption campaign, political connections, and court bias: Evidence from Chinese corporate lawsuits

Suing the Government under Independent Jurisdiction: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

Pursuing justice or protecting local firms? Shenzhen courts move beyond judicial local protectionism

Judiciary Independence and The Enforcement of Investor Protection Laws: Market Responses to the "1/15" Notice of the Supreme People's Court of China

Social Capital,Law Protection of Minority Investors and IPO Underpricing

Do environmental courts break collusion in environmental governance? Evidence from corporate green innovation in China

Social Trust and Entrepreneurship: Insights from China's Social Credit System

Administrative monopoly and state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from the fair competition review system in China