Abstract:During the past year, the state appellate courts have reviewed state legislation with a degree of restraint more marked than in the preceding year. The present attitude of the courts toward the work of legislatures may be in part the result of a change in court personnel. It is also both possible and probable that judges have been impressed by the more tolerant or liberal attitude of the United States Supreme Court. Finally, a few of the judges may have become aware of the fact that the times demand the relinquishment of an assumed judicial “supremacy” and the examination of legislative and administrative action under specific constitutional provisions in the light of social and economic realities. At all events, judicial review in the grand manner has given way to a more vigorous application of technical constitutional requirements. Courts are tending to emphasize procedure rather than substance; review appears to be at once more tolerant and more precise; decisions turn on narrower grounds, premises are less sweeping. When applied to state constitutions, this tendency means something quite different from what it means when applied to the national constitution. This tendency may perhaps be regarded as charged with possible evil results for the courts. Although state constitutions are, in most cases, so detailed and diverse that no actual diminution of the courts' discretionary powers need result, and although to a successful litigant it makes little difference whether a statute is invalidated for want of due process or for want of a proper title or enacting clause, it is difficult to conceive of many things that will bring the courts more quickly into popular disrepute than an exaggeration of constitutional technicalities.

A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload

The Effect of Ideology and Resource Advantages on Appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court

Panel selection on high courts

Has the Supreme Court become just another political branch? Public perceptions of court approval and legitimacy in a post- Dobbs world

Following Lower-Court Precedent

Negative Media Coverage of the Supreme Court: The Interactive Role of Opinion Language, Coalition Size, and Ideological Signals

Media Attention and Deliberation on the Supreme Court

Judicial hierarchy and discursive influence

Strong consensus on US Supreme Court spans a century

Analyzing the Rhetoric of Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

Explaining The Pace of Civil Case Litigation: The Latest Evidence From 37 Large Urban Trial Courts

State Constitutional Law in 1939–1940

The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It

Law on the Market? Abnormal Stock Returns and Supreme Court Decision-Making

Generative Dynamics of Supreme Court Citations: Analysis with a New Statistical Network Model

A Discursive Analytical Path of Appellate Court Opinions: Evaluation of Ideological Positioning in Bush V. Gore 2000

Statistical Mechanics of the US Supreme Court

Setting Boundaries Between Crime and Rights

A Computational Analysis of Oral Argument in the Supreme Court

Increasing volume and decreasing disruption in US case law

Institutional Stress and the Federal District Courts: Judicial Emergencies, Vertical Norms, and Pretrial Dismissals