Abstract:Two models, the hierarchical model and the local control model, drive the way we talk about the decisions court actors and judges make. However, neither considered in isolation is an adequate explanation of courts’ administrative policy choices during the Covid-19 pandemic. This paper explores how actors in state courts in the United States perceived and performed their policymaking capacity using elite interviews. It argues that considering features of both models provides a more nuanced explanation of the distribution of administrative authority in state courts. The interviews reveal that actors in court systems that both concentrate and distribute administrative authority behave in ways that contradict the prevailing explanatory model. The paper provides evidence of the value of recruiting and interviewing elites when researching court decision-making processes. This study contributes to our understanding of the consequences of centralized and decentralized administrative authority for court users. Utilizando entrevistas de élite, este trabajo explora cómo los actores de los tribunales estatales de Estados Unidos percibieron y desempeñaron su capacidad de formulación de políticas administrativas durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. Sostiene que considerar tanto las explicaciones jerárquicas como las de control local del comportamiento de quienes trabajan en los tribunales ofrece una explicación más matizada de la distribución de la autoridad administrativa en estos sistemas. Las entrevistas revelan que los actores de los sistemas judiciales que concentran y distribuyen la autoridad administrativa se comportan de formas que contradicen los modelos explicativos predominantes: en los sistemas administrativamente más descentralizados, algunos actores judiciales buscaban más orientación de los actores centrales, mientras que, en un sistema centralizado, algunos actores judiciales actuaban de formas que se desviaban de las órdenes centrales. Además de ampliar nuestra comprensión de las consecuencias para los usuarios de la autoridad administrativa centralizada y descentralizada de los tribunales, este trabajo aporta pruebas de las ventajas y los retos de realizar entrevistas con una muestra de élite a través de la tecnología.

Institutional Stress and the Federal District Courts: Judicial Emergencies, Vertical Norms, and Pretrial Dismissals

Testing the Model of Judicial Stress using a COVID-era survey of U.S. federal court personnel

The Effect of the Federal Judicial System on Public Enforcement: Evidence from SEC Enforcement Actions

Time Standards as a Court Management Tool: The Experience in American State and Local Trial Courts

Power to the Paperwork? Mandatory Financial Sanctions and the Bureaucratic Means to Racially Unequal Ends

Major Questions Doctrine Jujitsu: Using The Doctrine To Rein In District Court Judges

Explaining The Pace of Civil Case Litigation: The Latest Evidence From 37 Large Urban Trial Courts

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis

A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload

Federalism and the significance of Governmental Agencies and of organizational Experience at the time of country’s Crisis: Tracing the Emergency Medication Response System of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Decreased Bi-Partisan Support for Pretrial Detention in Less Serious Cases: Evidence From an Experimental Survey

Replacing Agency Adjudication with Independent Administrative Courts.

Judicial Decision Making under Changing Legal Standards: the Case of Dismissal Arbitration

Does electronic case-processing enhance court efficacy? New quantitative evidence

More Talk, Less Conflict: Evidence from Requiring Informal Discovery Conferences

Navigating an Overburdened Courtroom: How Inconsistent Rules, Shadow Procedures, and Social Capital Disadvantage Tenants in Eviction Court

Perceptions of administrative policymaking authority: evidence from interviews in three state court systems

Improving the Pace of Criminal Case Processing in State Trial Courts

Prolonged emergency and derogation of human rights: Why the European Court should raise its immunity system

Following Lower-Court Precedent