Explaining The Pace of Civil Case Litigation: The Latest Evidence From 37 Large Urban Trial Courts

John A. Goerdt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23277556.1991.10871132
IF: 0.707
1991-05-01
Justice System Journal
Abstract:This paper analyzes data on caseload size, caseload characteristics, case management features, and civil case processing times in 37 large urban trial courts, the largest number of state general jurisdiction trial courts ever included in a study of the pace of litigation. First, the paper concludes that most courts are far from meeting the American Bar Association civil case disposition time standards, especially the standard that 90 percent of all cases should be disposed within one year after filing. Second, bivariate and multivariate analysis reveals, as expected, that the size of the pending caseload per judge is the strongest correlate of median and 90th percentile case processing times, though the causal relationship between pending caseload per judge and the pace of litigation is unclear. The number of filings and dispositions per judge, however, were not related to the pace of litigation. Interestingly, courts in counties with larger populations were also more likely to have larger pending caseloads per judge, though the reason for this relationship is unclear. In addition, early court control in the scheduling of case events displayed a significant correlation with shorter case processing times, especially at the 90th percentile, after controlling for the influence of other factors. Trends in median case processing times are examined in 21 courts from the late 1970s through 1987. In general, the trend is toward longer case processing times, though a few courts made remarkable improvements. The paper concludes with a discussion of policy implications and suggestions for future research.
law
What problem does this paper attempt to address?