Abstract:Abstract Principles form part and parcel of our law and legal discourse, so much so that we seldom think of what they are and what they entail. For centuries they have been invoked daily to interpret and argue about the law. But when it comes to matters of constitutional law, principles are further called upon to perform a perennially controversial function: to help police the boundaries of state action. In most common law jurisdictions with a written constitution, this function of principles runs against the generally accepted view that the exercise of judicial review must ultimately be governed and restricted by the terms of the national constitution. This Article argues that the exercise of judicial review based on principles is not confined to that view, once the relationship between principles and the constitution is unpacked and recontextualized. While the English-language literature on principles over the past half-century has been dominated by a select group of Anglo-American scholars, there is a wealth of untapped insights from other parts of the world. One of the major contributions by continental legal theorists even predates the earliest modern Anglo-American writings on the subject by more than a decade. Overall, the law literature in common law and civil law systems reveals a significant degree of commonalities in the basic characters of principles despite the absence of initial evidence of transsystemic borrowings. The wider conceptual inquiry also displays a shift in the focus of the debate, from the protracted search for a clear-cut distinction between rules and principles towards a redefinition of principles’ relationship with “written” law, be it in the form of a civil code or a constitutional instrument. From this inquiry reemerge “unwritten” principles not deriving from codified or legislated law although they have been used to develop the law. Translated into the constitutional domain, these unwritten principles bear no logical connection with the terms of the constitution. Their main functions cover the entire spectrum from serving as interpretive aids to making law by filling gaps. The theoretical framework fits with an ongoing four-century-old narrative of the evolution of constitutional principles and judicial review across most common law-based systems. Constitutional principles are another area where Anglo-American law and legal discourse is less exceptional and more universal than what many assume. Throughout modern Western history, legal battles have been fought and ensuing developments have been made on the grounds of principles. Our law and jurisprudence remain based on them.

State Constitutional Law in 1939–1940

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Legal Principles, Constitutional Principles, and Judicial Review

Preferred Freedoms: The Progressive Expansion of State Power and the Rise of Modern Civil Liberties Jurisprudence

Originalism and Stare Decisis in the Lower Courts

Judging Judicial Review in the American States

Has the Supreme Court become just another political branch? Public perceptions of court approval and legitimacy in a post- Dobbs world

A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload

On Constitutional Politics

Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices: Quantitative Thematic Analysis of Multiple Opinions of “bush V. Gore 2000”

Constitutional Review without a Constitution: The British Story

Disenchantment and Self- Satisfaction: Influence of Political Theories on Constitutional Interpretation and Its Limits

Judicial Practice and Legal Interpretation of the US Constitution Prohibition towards Retroactive Legislature

Following Lower-Court Precedent

Dobbs and the Civil Dimension of Extraterritorial Abortion Regulation

The Duet of Formalism and Realism--Review on American constitutional judgements

THOMAS JEFFERSON PRZECIWKO „POLITYKOM W TOGACH”. KILKA UWAG DOTYCZĄCYCH SPORU O KIERUNKI INTERPRETACJI KONSTYTUCJI STANÓW ZJEDNOCZONYCH

Ironies of State Building: A Comparative Perspective on the American State

The European Court of Justice as a Constitutional Court. Legal Reasoning in a Comparative Perspective

The Global Expansion of Judicial Power

Legal Counterrevolution: Property and Judicial Power in the Weimar Republic