Abstract:Abstract Principles form part and parcel of our law and legal discourse, so much so that we seldom think of what they are and what they entail. For centuries they have been invoked daily to interpret and argue about the law. But when it comes to matters of constitutional law, principles are further called upon to perform a perennially controversial function: to help police the boundaries of state action. In most common law jurisdictions with a written constitution, this function of principles runs against the generally accepted view that the exercise of judicial review must ultimately be governed and restricted by the terms of the national constitution. This Article argues that the exercise of judicial review based on principles is not confined to that view, once the relationship between principles and the constitution is unpacked and recontextualized. While the English-language literature on principles over the past half-century has been dominated by a select group of Anglo-American scholars, there is a wealth of untapped insights from other parts of the world. One of the major contributions by continental legal theorists even predates the earliest modern Anglo-American writings on the subject by more than a decade. Overall, the law literature in common law and civil law systems reveals a significant degree of commonalities in the basic characters of principles despite the absence of initial evidence of transsystemic borrowings. The wider conceptual inquiry also displays a shift in the focus of the debate, from the protracted search for a clear-cut distinction between rules and principles towards a redefinition of principles’ relationship with “written” law, be it in the form of a civil code or a constitutional instrument. From this inquiry reemerge “unwritten” principles not deriving from codified or legislated law although they have been used to develop the law. Translated into the constitutional domain, these unwritten principles bear no logical connection with the terms of the constitution. Their main functions cover the entire spectrum from serving as interpretive aids to making law by filling gaps. The theoretical framework fits with an ongoing four-century-old narrative of the evolution of constitutional principles and judicial review across most common law-based systems. Constitutional principles are another area where Anglo-American law and legal discourse is less exceptional and more universal than what many assume. Throughout modern Western history, legal battles have been fought and ensuing developments have been made on the grounds of principles. Our law and jurisprudence remain based on them.

Constitutional Review without a Constitution: The British Story

Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

Establishing Judicial Review in China

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

"Constitutional Review" in China:Characteristics and Actuality of Generating——From the Perspective of the Tactics for Change of Three Related Terms

Assessment of the Rule of Law and Its Application in China

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

A "Revolution" Coming Late: The British Dispute about Its Parliamentary Sovereignty

A Constitution Without Constitutionalism? the Paths of Constitutional Development in China

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China†

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China

Constitutional Supervision in China after the 2018 Amendment of the PRC Constitution: Refining the Narrative of Constitutional Supremacy in a Socialist Legal System

Power Separation Principle and Deconstruction of Constitutional System of Britain

Legal Principles, Constitutional Principles, and Judicial Review

A Debate on the Probability of Constitutional Government in Modem China

The Evolution of Constitutional Adjudication in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions: Theory and Evidence

The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism

The study on some aspects of the rule of constitutional law

Chinese Legal Culture and Constitutional Order

British "Parliamentary Sovereignty": Its Theory Evolution and Concept Analysis

Towards Constitutional Re-Enlightenment: Teaching American Constitutional Law in China