Abstract:Under what conditions will two subnational supreme courts diverge fundamentally in their understandings of, and approaches toward, constitutional adjudication, in spite of being invested with identical jurisdictions and overseen by a shared sovereign, within roughly the same time frame? China's two autonomous Special Administrative Regions (SARs), Hong Kong and Macau, possess constitutional frameworks that are nearly the same, yet their paths of judicial review of legislation could not be more different. While the Chinese SARs commonly feature undivided governments returned by rigged electoral systems dominated by the pro-establishment blocs in their respective polities, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal has repeatedly nullified unconstitutional acts of the legislature with finality, while the Macau Tribunal de Última Instância has never challenged the validity of legislation at all. This study argues that such divergence can hardly be blamed on the differences between Hong Kong's English common law and Macau's Portuguese civil law heritages. It reveals, with the aid of a theoretical framework that integrates the concept of transaction costs into the strategic model of judicial review, that factional infighting inside, and formidable popular resistance against, Hong Kong's ruling elite have disabled the government to credibly threaten the Court while reinforcing demand for judicial review of unpopular statutes. By contrast, high levels of executive-legislative harmony, minimal popular unrest, and weak pressures to democratize have rendered it very difficult for the Macau Tribunal to defy its government with impunity. Overall, this study contributes to several increasingly important academic fields, including comparative Chinese law, subnational constitutional law, and judicial review in authoritarian polities.INTRODUCTIONI. A STRATEGIC TRANSACTION COST PERSPECTIVE ON JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER UNIFIED AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENTSII. COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE FROM HONG KONG AND MACAUA. OverviewB. Track Record in Reviewing and Invalidating LegislationC. Understandings of the Scope and Extent of the Judicial Power of Concrete ReviewD. Approaches to Abstract Constitutional ReviewIII. ANALYSISA. OverviewB. External ResistanceC. Regime IncoherenceIV. ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONSV. CONCLUSION

"Constitutional Review" in China:Characteristics and Actuality of Generating——From the Perspective of the Tactics for Change of Three Related Terms

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

Assessment of the Rule of Law and Its Application in China

Constitutional Supervision in China after the 2018 Amendment of the PRC Constitution: Refining the Narrative of Constitutional Supremacy in a Socialist Legal System

Constitutional Review without a Constitution: The British Story

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Establishing Judicial Review in China

A Constitution Without Constitutionalism? the Paths of Constitutional Development in China

Chinese Constitutionality in Globalization Era

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China†

A Debate on the Probability of Constitutional Government in Modem China

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China

From "people's Sovereignty" to "human Right"--Vicissitude of Study Mode of Science of Constitution in China

The Limits of Constitutional Amendments and the Challenges of Constitutional Amending Models——A Legal Appraisal in the Context of China's Constitutional Development in the Past Sixty Years

Anti-Corruption in a Party-State: Constitutional Implications of China's Supervisory Reform

Development and Improvement to the basic principles of constitution in China

Towards Constitutional Re-Enlightenment: Teaching American Constitutional Law in China

The Evolution of Constitutional Adjudication in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions: Theory and Evidence