Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

The Limits of Constitutional Amendments and the Challenges of Constitutional Amending Models——A Legal Appraisal in the Context of China's Constitutional Development in the Past Sixty Years

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Constitutional Supervision in China after the 2018 Amendment of the PRC Constitution: Refining the Narrative of Constitutional Supremacy in a Socialist Legal System

A Constitution Without Constitutionalism? the Paths of Constitutional Development in China

A Debate on the Probability of Constitutional Government in Modem China

Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

A Reflection on Democracy and Constitutionalism

A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China

Development and Improvement to the basic principles of constitution in China

"Constitutional Review" in China:Characteristics and Actuality of Generating——From the Perspective of the Tactics for Change of Three Related Terms

Anti-Corruption in a Party-State: Constitutional Implications of China's Supervisory Reform

Chinese Constitutionality in Globalization Era

The Boundary Tablet Marking the Intellectual Province of Constitutional Law——A Dialogue about the Constituent Power between a Political Scientist and a Constitutional Legal Scholar

On the Selective Application of the Chinese Constitution

Functional Propriety Doctrine and the Choice of the Constitutional Interpretation's Mode——Beginning with the "advisory Opinion Ban" of U. S. A.

From "the Executive-led" to "Limited Government"

The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism

On Legal System's Positions and Roles in Building the Democratic Politics

From "people's Sovereignty" to "human Right"--Vicissitude of Study Mode of Science of Constitution in China