Functional Propriety Doctrine and the Choice of the Constitutional Interpretation's Mode——Beginning with the "advisory Opinion Ban" of U. S. A.

ZHANG Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-462x.2007.01.026
2007-01-01
Abstract:One of the main questions of constitutional research of China is the mode of constitutional interpretation.This article started with the precedent advisory opinion ban established in 1793,and argued that the mode of constitutional interpretation must suit the functions of the organ which had the power of interpretation.From the Principle of functional propriety,this article argued that under the current system,the only possible mode of China constitutional interpretation is abstract interpretation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?