Abstract:Abstract Principles form part and parcel of our law and legal discourse, so much so that we seldom think of what they are and what they entail. For centuries they have been invoked daily to interpret and argue about the law. But when it comes to matters of constitutional law, principles are further called upon to perform a perennially controversial function: to help police the boundaries of state action. In most common law jurisdictions with a written constitution, this function of principles runs against the generally accepted view that the exercise of judicial review must ultimately be governed and restricted by the terms of the national constitution. This Article argues that the exercise of judicial review based on principles is not confined to that view, once the relationship between principles and the constitution is unpacked and recontextualized. While the English-language literature on principles over the past half-century has been dominated by a select group of Anglo-American scholars, there is a wealth of untapped insights from other parts of the world. One of the major contributions by continental legal theorists even predates the earliest modern Anglo-American writings on the subject by more than a decade. Overall, the law literature in common law and civil law systems reveals a significant degree of commonalities in the basic characters of principles despite the absence of initial evidence of transsystemic borrowings. The wider conceptual inquiry also displays a shift in the focus of the debate, from the protracted search for a clear-cut distinction between rules and principles towards a redefinition of principles’ relationship with “written” law, be it in the form of a civil code or a constitutional instrument. From this inquiry reemerge “unwritten” principles not deriving from codified or legislated law although they have been used to develop the law. Translated into the constitutional domain, these unwritten principles bear no logical connection with the terms of the constitution. Their main functions cover the entire spectrum from serving as interpretive aids to making law by filling gaps. The theoretical framework fits with an ongoing four-century-old narrative of the evolution of constitutional principles and judicial review across most common law-based systems. Constitutional principles are another area where Anglo-American law and legal discourse is less exceptional and more universal than what many assume. Throughout modern Western history, legal battles have been fought and ensuing developments have been made on the grounds of principles. Our law and jurisprudence remain based on them.

Power Separation Principle and Deconstruction of Constitutional System of Britain

Constitutional Review without a Constitution: The British Story

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

British "Parliamentary Sovereignty": Its Theory Evolution and Concept Analysis

A "Revolution" Coming Late: The British Dispute about Its Parliamentary Sovereignty

Perfecting the Separating Power System in Property Right Reform

The Changing Concepts of the Constitution

Accommodating Legal Pluralism and “Pluralizing” the Constitution: The Example of the United Kingdom

Restrictions and Separation of Power: Police Power in Criminal Justice

Separation of Powers: American Power Structure and Its Impact on China-US Relations

Separation of Powers, 'traditional' Administration, and Responsible Regulation

The Study on the Thoughts of Separation of Power and Anti-Authoritarian in the Reviving Feudalism Proposal during the Late Ming and Early Qing Dynasties

An Analysis of the Structural Imbalance in Power Construction of the 1982 Constitution:a Case Study of the Wu Ying Case

The Internal Logic of the Separation of Decision-Making,Enforcement and Oversight

Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

The Boundary Tablet Marking the Intellectual Province of Constitutional Law——A Dialogue about the Constituent Power between a Political Scientist and a Constitutional Legal Scholar

The Functional Propriety as the Principle of Distribution of the State Powers:Focussing on the German Constitutional Jurisprudence

Principle and Practice of Separation of Politics and Religion in Modern Political Development

Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States

On Hong kong's Judicial Power in a Dual Track Politics

Legal Principles, Constitutional Principles, and Judicial Review