Siblings Of The Dragon: China'S Territories And Constitutional Law
Tu Kai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2677625
2015-01-01
Tsinghua china law review
Abstract:Ideologically, statist socialism remains the People's Republic of China (PRC)'s orthodoxy, but Hong Kong retains a "free market" of speech and belief in accordance with the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Societally, in China's peripheries, ethnic minorities, as territorial majority groups, are entitled to preserve their languages and cultures in autonomous (administrative) regions. Thus constitutionally, the Chinese state is a hybrid of various constituent units - special administrative regions, ethnic autonomous regions, and others of diverse legal statues the theoretically "unitary" nature is under question. According to Chinese legend, a dragon can have nine siblings and each of them are different - one who loves music sits on a lute; another who has good eyes resides up on the roof. This article argues that the asymmetry of Chinese territories, like the differences among the dragon's siblings, has set the Chinese territories apart from ordinary administrative divisions, and created a unique regime of jurisprudential significance.As a matter of scope, this article will explore only three phenomena. The first section addresses the heterarchy of authorities in the Chinese context. The PRC central government and the territories are neither of equal authority, nor do they form a heterarchy of authorities with the PRC central government at the top. Ordinary administrative divisions are subordinate to a central government, but the territories may vary in institutions, cultures, and political attachments. The second section goes to the relationship between the authorities and citizens/nationals. The PRC, as a theoretically unitary state, still does not offer homogenous citizenship to all Chinese nationals. In fact, Chinese nationals registering residentship in different jurisdictions are entitled to various rights and legal treatments; in many circumstances, Chinese nationals are neither citizens nor aliens in a Chinese territory. This, nevertheless, has much outstripped what ordinary administrative divisions are supposed to do. In the third section, the article addresses the territories' relationship with the international community. The structure of this article may be understood as a tripartite covering the relationship between the territorial authorities and the PRC central government with territorial authorities, individuals and foreign states respectively. Hypothetically, a unitary state's relationship, legal or political, with its citizens/nationals should be simple and direct. As modernist constitutionalism presumes, the constituent power shall vest in a singular "people" as the demos of a liberal democracy and the constituted power ought to be primarily provided by a single Constitution. However, this article argues that Chinese cases obviously depart from this presumption.