Abstract:The publication examines the formation of the judiciary of constitutional jurisdiction both in Ukraine and abroad. Different approaches to the formation of the composition of constitutional review bodies are analyzed, historical, economic, political and niche factors that determined a certain order of formation of such bodies are identified. The important role of the peculiarities of the formation of the composition of the bodies of constitutional jurisdiction in ensuring the independence of this body and in ensuring the proper legal protection of the constitution is noted. It is noted that the analysis of foreign experience in this issue is an impetus to expand scientific and expert discussion in this direction in order to find the best ways to overcome the problem of quality formation of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, given the established successful practices of foreign countries. It is established that the role and importance of the body of constitutional justice in society and the legal and political system of a modern constitutional, democratic state is extremely important. The Constitutional Court, as a body of constitutional control, occupies an important place in the mechanism of legitimation of state power, as it is designed to protect the constitutionally enshrined sovereignty of the people from illegal actions and decisions of public authorities. To this end, the Court must act as an unconditional authoritative body of state power, endowed not only with the right but also with a real opportunity to take measures aimed at protecting the Constitution. One of the important elements of ensuring this status is the proper and high-quality staffing of the Court with highly professional staff, which is primarily related to the processes of forming the CCU. However, as noted in the scientific and expert community, even in those European countries where the so- called mixed principle of forming a body of constitutional jurisdiction (as in Ukraine), no universal approach is used to appoint judges of the constitutional court, as each state regulates this issue. in his own way. Therefore, proposals are made, in particular, given the peculiarities of our political system and incomplete judicial reform, it would be appropriate to exclude the Congress of Judges from among the entities authorized to form the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (let’s not forget that this requires changes to Of the Constitution), and to entrust the procedure of selection of CCU judges to the relevant commission, the members of which would be nominated by both national and international experts. Resolving these issues is extremely important, and therefore is an impetus to expand scientific and expert discussion in this direction in order to find the best ways to overcome the problem of quality formation of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, given the established successful practices of foreign countries.

Model of constitutional supervision in the French Fourth Republic: real protection of the Constitution or rapid paralysis of the institutional system of the state

A Reflection on Democracy and Constitutionalism

History and Socio-Political Conditions of Preparation of the Polish Constitutions from 1919 to 1997

The Constitution Crisis in the Early Years of the Republic——An Analysis of the Constitutional View Between Yuan Shi-kai and Charles de Gaulle

REGULATION OF PRELIMINARY CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN THE POST-SOVIET STATES (COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS IN RUSSIA)

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Aspects of taking into account foreign experience in the formation of bodies of constitutional jurisdiction in Ukraine

The formation of the composition of the Constitutional Court of Russia in 1994–1995 (on the history of the issue and constitutional and legal aspects)

Historical roots and current state of the “public - private law” issue in French legal doctrine

Public Control: The Evolution of Views in the Context of Russian Constitutionalism and Significance for the Modern State

The Main Scientific Approaches to Understanding the Effectiveness of Public Authority in Russian Constitutional Law

The implicative relationship paradigm of democracy and constitutionalism: key values

Parliamentary Control in Unity with the System of State Control (Supervision), Municipal Control and Public Control: Modern Understanding and Prospects for Development

Constitutional law in the system of international law

Constitution without Constitutionalism? Challenges to constitutionalism in the Kyrgyz Republic

System of protection of rights and freedoms human and citizens: doctrinal principles

Constitutional Reform in the Second Half of the 1930s: Completing the Soviet Nation-Building Processes

The study on some aspects of the rule of constitutional law

The Function of Constitution in the Private Law Order

The Constitutional Reform in Russia: Relevancy, Implementation, Prospects. Part 2. Amendments to the Constitution: Unsolved and New Issues and the Further Reformation Vector

Basic principles of the constitutional system of local self-government