Abstract:The publication examines the formation of the judiciary of constitutional jurisdiction both in Ukraine and abroad. Different approaches to the formation of the composition of constitutional review bodies are analyzed, historical, economic, political and niche factors that determined a certain order of formation of such bodies are identified. The important role of the peculiarities of the formation of the composition of the bodies of constitutional jurisdiction in ensuring the independence of this body and in ensuring the proper legal protection of the constitution is noted. It is noted that the analysis of foreign experience in this issue is an impetus to expand scientific and expert discussion in this direction in order to find the best ways to overcome the problem of quality formation of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, given the established successful practices of foreign countries. It is established that the role and importance of the body of constitutional justice in society and the legal and political system of a modern constitutional, democratic state is extremely important. The Constitutional Court, as a body of constitutional control, occupies an important place in the mechanism of legitimation of state power, as it is designed to protect the constitutionally enshrined sovereignty of the people from illegal actions and decisions of public authorities. To this end, the Court must act as an unconditional authoritative body of state power, endowed not only with the right but also with a real opportunity to take measures aimed at protecting the Constitution. One of the important elements of ensuring this status is the proper and high-quality staffing of the Court with highly professional staff, which is primarily related to the processes of forming the CCU. However, as noted in the scientific and expert community, even in those European countries where the so- called mixed principle of forming a body of constitutional jurisdiction (as in Ukraine), no universal approach is used to appoint judges of the constitutional court, as each state regulates this issue. in his own way. Therefore, proposals are made, in particular, given the peculiarities of our political system and incomplete judicial reform, it would be appropriate to exclude the Congress of Judges from among the entities authorized to form the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (let’s not forget that this requires changes to Of the Constitution), and to entrust the procedure of selection of CCU judges to the relevant commission, the members of which would be nominated by both national and international experts. Resolving these issues is extremely important, and therefore is an impetus to expand scientific and expert discussion in this direction in order to find the best ways to overcome the problem of quality formation of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, given the established successful practices of foreign countries.

The formation of the composition of the Constitutional Court of Russia in 1994–1995 (on the history of the issue and constitutional and legal aspects)

Aspects of taking into account foreign experience in the formation of bodies of constitutional jurisdiction in Ukraine

Judicial reform of Alexander II and its historical and legal significance for the Russian constitutional system

Genesis of establishment and development of the judicial system of the Russian Federation in the late XX – early XXI centuries: institutional and normative characteristics

The concept of the unity of the judicial system according to the Regulations on the Judiciary of the RSFSR of 1922 (To the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation)

REGULATION OF PRELIMINARY CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN THE POST-SOVIET STATES (COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS IN RUSSIA)

Continuity of the judiciary in the context of modern Ukrainian state formation

Modern features and trends in the development of the Russian state (constitutional and legal aspect)

Building an Effective System of Protection of Citizens’ Rights as the Main Task of Judicial Reform in Russia

Preface to the adoption of judicial statutes and preparation for judicial reform in 1864

Regional Constitutional Justice in the Context of Russia’s Aspiration to be a Rule of Law State

THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE AND ITS INSTITUTIONAL (UN-)CERTAINTY: CURRENT PROBLEMS OF DOMESTIC STATE BUILDING

The Constitutional Reform in Russia: Relevancy, Implementation, Prospects. Part 2. Amendments to the Constitution: Unsolved and New Issues and the Further Reformation Vector

Development of the Russian Federation as a Social State in the Context of the 30th Anniversary of the Constitution of the Russian Federation

Influence of the Positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights on the Сontent of the Adversarial Principle in Criminal Procedure Law

Organizational and Legal Issues Related to the Introduction of the Investigating Judge Institution in the Russian Federation

The Concept and Key Elements of the Structure of the Judicial Administrative Procedure Implemented in the Russian Federation

CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL BASIS FOR THE FORMATION OF THE CORPS OF PROFESSIONAL JUDGES: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE

Constitutional evolution of Russia (review of the collection of scientific articles: 25 years of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: constitutional dialogue / ed. by V.T. Kabyshev. Saratov : Publishing house of the Saratov State Law Academy, 2019. 380 p.)

The Constitutional Right to Review of Court Judgments in Criminal Cases: The Content, New Realities

Constitutional Reform in the Second Half of the 1930s: Completing the Soviet Nation-Building Processes