Abstract:Independent judicial systems exist to protect individual rights from state encroachment and majoritarian pressures. Citizens’ property rights depend particularly on judiciaries’ willingness and ability to restrain the political branches of power. In turn, upholding the rule of law from the perspective of enforcing contracts and securing property rights is seen as crucial for promoting economic development because investment capital will flee without government commitments not to seize property or tax profits at confiscatory rates. This article brings empirical research closer to the understanding of those judging the market: investors, entrepreneurs, and analysts that recommend where to commit resources abroad. We test hypotheses connecting de jure judicial independence, de facto judicial independence, and the rule of law using a unique dataset of 174 countries from 1996-2019. Importantly, we find that judicial independence in practice (de facto independence) is more important for the rule of law than formal judicial independence (de jure independence). Thus, promoting de facto judicial independence can improve countries’ prospects for economic and political development. To be sure, courts in countries that have de jure independence can also be de facto independent. We find, however, that institutional talk is cheap in the context of the judiciary; markets will judge countries with low rule of law harshly for investment and ensuing economic growth.

Courts, Crime and Economic Performance: Evidence from a Judicial Reform in Kenya

Court Enforcement, Bank Loans, and Firm Investment: Evidence from a Bankruptcy Reform in Brazil

Online Judicial Auction, Loan Availability, and Corporate Investment in China

Environmental judicial reform and corporate investment behavior - Based on a quasi-natural experiment of environmental courts

Judicial Independence, Local Protectionism, and Economic Integration: Evidence from China

Randomization Inference for Before-and-After Studies with Multiple Units: An Application to a Criminal Procedure Reform in Uruguay

Does electronic case-processing enhance court efficacy? New quantitative evidence

Does legal justice promote stakeholder justice? Evidence from a judicial reform in China

Judging the Market: Judicial Independence, the Rule of Law, and Economic Development

Draining the judiciary bottleneck: A quasi-experiment in improving a government service

Did the French reform of the judicial map affect conciliation activities?

Confidence in the Judicial System: Evidence from Brazil

Information and Bargaining through Agents: Experimental Evidence from Mexico’s Labour Courts

Judicial Career Incentives and Court Performance: An Empirical Study of the German Labour Courts of Appeal

Judicial Independence and Corporate Employment: Evidence from China

Convicting Corrupt Officials: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Cases

Legal Aid and Criminal Justice Reform : Advancing Fairness and Equity

Monitoring Courts: A Top-down or Grassroots Approach?

Judicial Efficiency and Bank Credit to Firms

Suing the Government under Weak Rule of Law: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

The Economic Impact of Organized Crime Infiltration in the Legal Economy: Evidence from the Judicial Administration of Organized Crime Firms