Abstract:At the eve of the reorganization of the Netherlands Judiciary which led to fully responsible boards of the courts and a council for the Judiciary, in 1998 an inventory was made of bottle necks in the performance of the courts, as perceived by their users, and the gains for society of removing these bottlenecks were calculated in economic terms. Conceptually as well as from the perspective of data availability, this was not an easy undertaking. Now fifteen years later, it is of interest to evaluate whether the bottlenecks were solved and the then calculated gains reached. This paper reports the outcome of this evaluation with respect to civil and administrative cases. It shows that substantial progress was made, for instance, by reducing court delay and that a large part of the previously calculated gains was realized. But it also shows that the demands of society have increased further about timeliness, and, in particular, about digital access of the courts. And again substantial gains are possible and necessary. Within the Netherlands Judiciary it was recently concluded that these improvements require redesign of the laws of procedure to make procedures less formal and much faster, but also demand radical digitalization. As to the methodological aspects, the knowledge about the impact of the judicial function on the welfare of society is growing. However, the assessment of the economic impact of specific improvements such as reduction of court delay, let alone improved reasoning and consistency of judicial decisions, is still rare. The paper discusses possibilities and complications. While it is feasible to assess the direct gains to the parties in a court procedure, the gains resulting from a more effective "shadow of the law" due to the quicker and more predictable adjudication of cases are still elusive.

Judicial Career Incentives and Court Performance: An Empirical Study of the German Labour Courts of Appeal

On the Judicial Efficiency

Improved performance of the Netherlands Judiciary: Assessment Of The Gains For Society

Does the appointment of judges increase the output of the judiciary?

Judicial Law-Making in the Criminal Decisions of the Polish Supreme Court and the German Federal Court of Justice: A Comparative View

Courts, Crime and Economic Performance: Evidence from a Judicial Reform in Kenya

Board-Level Codetermination in Germany - The Importance and Economic Impact of Fiduciary Duties

Does Judge Turnover Affect Judicial Performance? Evidence from Italian Court Records

Judges in the Lab: No Precedent Effects, No Common/Civil Law Differences

Productivity and efficiency in the evaluation of judicial activity

Does electronic case-processing enhance court efficacy? New quantitative evidence

Self‐Efficacy, Prosocial Impact, and Self‐Legitimacy as Psychological Predictors of Judicial Officer Performance

Works Councils as Gatekeepers: Codetermination, Management Practices, and Job Satisfaction

Cui bono? Judicial decision-making in the era of AI: A qualitative study on the expectations of judges in Germany

Inputs and Outputs on Appeal: An Empirical Study of Briefs, Big Law, and Case Complexity

Information and Bargaining through Agents: Experimental Evidence from Mexico’s Labour Courts

Determinants of Success in University Careers: Findings from the German Academic Labor Market / Erfolgsfaktoren in der Wissenschaft – Ergebnisse aus einer Habilitiertenbefragung an deutschen Universitäten

Mandatory Retirement for Judges Improved the Performance of US State Supreme Courts

Improving Compliance with Labor Laws: The Role of Courts

Judges’ interpretation of laws and labor rights protection: a study of labor contract-related court decisions in China

Judicial Independence and Corporate Employment: Evidence from China