Improving Compliance with Labor Laws: The Role of Courts

Guy Davidov,Edo Eshet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3776134

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Enforcement of labor laws is inherently challenging and seriously lacking. Literature in this area has focused on proposing and examining legislative solutions and ways to make the work of enforcement agencies more effective. Without detracting from the importance of these aspects, we argue that courts have a role to play in improving compliance as well. We begin by reviewing three bodies of literature that explain how the law can be shaped to induce compliance: economic analysis (including behavioral law and economics); behavioral ethics; and the expressive function of the law. For each of these theories, we show the relevance for labor law. We then move to consider some specific contexts within labor law in which judges, in particular, can influence compliance. Relying on examples from Israeli case-law, we show that courts already take such considerations into account, and we argue that they should do so explicitly and more consistently. We discuss judgments that can be understood as an attempt to raise awareness to the law; the need to balance between ambiguity and specificity when judicially developing the law, to improve compliance; the possibility of using a third party to pressure others into compliance; and ways to induce compliance through remedies. We then reply to a possible critique that judges lack the legitimacy to take compliance considerations into account in their judgments.