1 1-1-2016 Realizing the Precautionary Principle in Due Diligence
Ling Chen
2016-01-01
Abstract:The precautionary principle is a legal principle that has found considerable support in international environmental law. Its emergence, however, has not been without problems and controversies: how do we define its normative content and trigger elements, and how do we ensure concrete implementation. The 2011 Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion used states’ due diligence obligations to prevent harm to realize the precautionary principle. Focusing on this case, this article examines how the precautionary principle can be applied using the concept of due diligence. First, this article explores the precautionary concept using examples from a selection of regional and multilateral environmental instruments, analyzing its origin and different expressions and identifying the problems in its application. Second, the article analyzes the Pulp Mills case and the Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion to substantiate the role of the obligation to take precautionary measures in the legal framework of due diligence. Third, by reference to the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities and the International Law Association’s study report on the Legal Principles relating to Climate Change, along with a number of international cases, the article further illustrates the distinction between due diligence, prevention and precaution and argues that they are actually interrelated. Citation: (2016) 25 Dal J Leg Stud 1. * Ling Chen is a research assistant with the International Law Research Program of the Centre for International Governance Innovation. He holds an LL.M. from the University of Toronto and an LL.B. and an LL.M. from Beihang University in China. The author wishes to thank Professor Jutta Brunnée for helpful comments on earlier draft of this article, and the editors and reviewers at the Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies for advice and support. 2 REALIZING THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN DUE DILIGENCE Vol. 25 The precautionary principle is one of the emergent legal principles that has received increased awareness from states and academic literature.1 Although this principle has achieved a level of sophistication in international environmental law, a uniform understanding has not been reached regarding its meaning, normative content, and legal status.2 Nor has its application and consequence become precise.3 In 2011, however, the advisory opinion of the Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) on Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with respect to Activities in the Area (Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion) shed some light on the concrete application of the precautionary approach.4 The Chamber indicated that the precautionary approach is “an integral part of the general obligation of due diligence.”5 Up until now, precaution and the due diligence obligation to prevent harm have been 1 For detailed analyses of the use of precautionary concept in national laws, and regional and international instruments see e.g. James Cameron & Juli Abouchar, “The Precautionary Principle: A Fundamental Principle of Law and Policy for the Protection of the Global Environment” (1991) 14:1 Boston College Intl & Comp L Rev 1 at 4–18; Chris Tollefson & Jamie Thornback, “Litigating the Precautionary Principle in Domestic Courts” (2008) 19:1 J Envtl L & Prac 33 at 35–48; Andri G Wibisana, “The Development of the Precautionary Principle in International and Indonesian Environmental Law” (2011) 14 Asia Pac J Envtl L 169 at 172–78, 190–202 [Wibisana]. A large number of academic writings have touched on this topic. See e.g. David Freestone & Ellen Hey, eds, The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996) [Freestone & Hey]; Joakim Zander, The Application of the Precautionary Principle in Practice: Comparative Dimensions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010); James Crawford, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) at 357–58 [Crawford]; Bénédicte Sage-Fuller, The Precautionary Principle in Marine Environmental Law, With Special Reference to High Risk Vessels (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013) [Sage-Fuller]. 2 Philippe Sands, Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd ed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) at 272; Barbara Nicoletti, “The Prevention of Natural and Man-Made Disasters: What Duties for States?” in Andrea de Guttry, Marco Gestri & Gabriella Venturini, eds, International Disaster Response Law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2012) 177 at 188; Wibisana, supra note 1 at 170–71; Crawford, supra note 1 at 357; Sage-Fuller, supra note 1 at 82. 3 James E Hickey, Jr & Vern R Walker, “Refining the Precautionary Principle in International Environmental Law” (1995) 14:3 Va Envtl LJ 423 at 424–25; Cass R Sunstein, “Beyond the Precautionary Principle” (2003) 151:3 U Pa L Rev 1003 at 1004–08; Elizabeth Tedsen & Gesa Homann, “Implementing the Precautionary Principle for Climate Engineering” (2013) 7:2 Carbon & Climate L Rev 90 at 94–95 [Tedsen & Homann]. 4 Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with respect to Activities in the Area (1 February 2011), Advisory Opinion, the Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea, No 17 [Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion]. “The Seabed Disputes Chamber is competent to give an advisory opinion on legal questions arising within the scope of the activities of the Assembly or Council of the International Seabed Authority.” See ITLOS, Jurisdiction, online: . 5 Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion, supra note 4 at para 131.