Abstract:Women are underrepresented in academia's higher ranks. Promotion oftentimes requires positive student-provided course evaluations. At a U.S. university, both an archival and an experimental investigation uncovered gender discrimination that affected both men and women. A department's gender composition and the course levels being taught interacted to predict biases in evaluations. However, women were disproportionately impacted because women were more often in the gender minority. A subsequent audit of the university's promotion guidelines suggested a disproportionate impact on women's career trajectories. Our framework was guided by role congruity theory, which poses that workplace positions are gendered by the ratios of men and women who fill them. We hypothesized that students would expect educators in a department's gender majority to fill more so essential positions of teaching upper-level courses and those in the minority to fill more so supportive positions of teaching lower-level courses. Consistent with role congruity theory when an educator's gender violated expected gendered roles, we generally found discrimination in the form of lower evaluation scores. A follow-up experiment demonstrated that it was possible to change students' expectations about which gender would teach their courses. When we assigned students randomly to picture themselves as students in a male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-parity department, we shifted their expectations of whether men or women would teach upper- and lower-level courses. Violating students' expectations created negative biases in teaching evaluations. This provided a causal link between department gender composition and discrimination. The importance of gender representation and ameliorating strategies are discussed.

Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts

Gender In-Group Bias: Evidence from Judicial Decisions

Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Mandatory Female Board Representation

Do Judges Exhibit Gender Bias? Evidence from the Universe of Divorce Cases in China

The impact of maleness on judicial decision making: masculinity, chivalry, and immigration appeals

Sexism in the Judiciary

Ascriptive Characteristics and Perceptions of Impropriety in the Rule of Law: Race, Gender, and Public Assessments of Whether Judges Can Be Impartial

Sex Disparities in Sentencing and Judges’ Beliefs: A Vignette Approach

Jurors’ Responses to Expert Witness Testimony: The Effects of Gender Stereotypes

Gender Biased Legal Case Retrieval System on Users' Decision Process

Determinants of Writing Style on the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals

Women in the Courtroom

La discriminación laboral en el Poder Judicial chileno. Una caracterización de las percepciones al interior de la institución

Assessing Gender Bias in LLMs: Comparing LLM Outputs with Human Perceptions and Official Statistics

Judicial Favoritism of Politicians: Evidence from Small Claims Court

Effects of biological and psychological gender, age cohort, and interviewer gender on attitudes toward gender-inclusive/exclusive language

Causally Testing Gender Bias in LLMs: A Case Study on Occupational Bias

Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments

Gender bias in teaching evaluations: the causal role of department gender composition

Gender Bias Detection in Court Decisions: A Brazilian Case Study

Do Voters Judge the Performance of Female and Male Politicians Differently? Experimental Evidence from the United States and Australia