Abstract:Gender bias distorts the economic behavior and outcomes of women and households. We investigate gender biases in property taxes. We analyze records of more than 100,000 property tax appeal hearings and more than 2.7 years of associated audio recordings, considering how panelist and appellant genders associate with hearing outcomes. We first observe that female appellants fare systematically worse than male appellants in their hearings. Second, we show that, whereas male appellants' hearing outcomes do not vary meaningfully with the gender composition of the panel they face, those of female appellants' do, such that female appellants obtain systematically lesser (greater) reductions to their home values when facing female (male) panelists. Employing a multi-modal large language model (M-LLM), we next construct measures of participant behavior and tone from hearing audio recordings. We observe markedly different behaviors between male and female appellants and, in the case of male appellants, we find that these differences also depend on the gender of the panelists they face (e.g., male appellants appear to behave systematically more aggressively towards female panelists). In contrast, the behavior of female appellants remains relatively constant, regardless of their panel's gender. Finally, we show that female appellants continue to fare worse in front of female panels, even when we condition upon the appelant's in-hearing behavior and tone. Our results are thus consistent with the idea that gender biases are driven, at least in part, by unvoiced beliefs and perceptions on the part of ARB panelists. Our study documents the presence of gender biases in property appraisal appeal hearings and highlights the potential value of generative AI for analyzing large-scale, unstructured administrative data.

Gender In-Group Bias: Evidence from Judicial Decisions

Do Judges Exhibit Gender Bias? Evidence from the Universe of Divorce Cases in China

Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts

Gender Biased Legal Case Retrieval System on Users' Decision Process

Sexism in the Judiciary

Gender bias in child custody judgments: Evidence from Chinese family court

Women in the Courtroom

The impact of maleness on judicial decision making: masculinity, chivalry, and immigration appeals

Gender Bias and Property Taxes

Sex Disparities in Sentencing and Judges’ Beliefs: A Vignette Approach

Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments

Jurors’ Responses to Expert Witness Testimony: The Effects of Gender Stereotypes

Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from 19,130 Resumes in China

Gender Bias Detection in Court Decisions: A Brazilian Case Study

Gender Discrimination in China: Experimental Evidence from the Job Market for College Graduates

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Causally Testing Gender Bias in LLMs: A Case Study on Occupational Bias

AI Gender Bias, Disparities, and Fairness: Does Training Data Matter?

Gender Bias in Big Data Analysis

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Legal Techniques for Rationalizing Biased Judicial Decisions: Evidence from Experiments with Real Judges