Abstract:Introduction: DBS efficacy depends on accuracy. CT-MRI fusion is established for both stereotactic registration and electrode placement verification. The desire to streamline DBS workflows, reduce operative time, and minimize patient transfers has increased interest in portable imaging modalities such as the Medtronic O-arm ® and mobile CT. However, these remain expensive and bulky. 3D C-arm fluoroscopy (3DXT) units are a smaller and less costly alternative, albeit incompatible with traditional frame-based localization and without useful soft tissue resolution. We aimed to compare fusion of 3DXT and CT with pre-operative MRI to evaluate if 3DXT-MRI fusion alone is sufficient for accurate registration and reliable targeting verification. We further assess DBS targeting accuracy using a 3DXT workflow and compare radiation dosimetry between modalities. Methods: Patients underwent robot-assisted DBS implantation using a workflow incorporating 3DXT which we describe. Two intra-operative 3DXT spins were performed for registration and accuracy verification followed by conventional CT post-operatively. Post-operative 3DXT and CT images were independently fused to the same pre-operative MRI sequence and co-ordinates generated for comparison. Registration accuracy was compared to 15 consecutive controls who underwent CT-based registration. Radial targeting accuracy was calculated and radiation dosimetry recorded. Results: Data were obtained from 29 leads in 15 consecutive patients. 3DXT registration accuracy was significantly superior to CT with mean error 0.22 ± 0.03 mm ( p < 0.0001). Mean Euclidean electrode tip position variation for CT to MRI versus 3DXT to MRI fusion was 0.62 ± 0.40 mm (range 0.0 mm–1.7 mm). In comparison, direct CT to 3DXT fusion showed electrode tip Euclidean variance of 0.23 ± 0.09 mm. Mean radial targeting accuracy assessed on 3DXT was 0.97 ± 0.54 mm versus 1.15 ± 0.55 mm on CT with differences insignificant ( p = 0.30). Mean patient radiation doses were around 80% lower with 3DXT versus CT ( p < 0.0001). Discussion: Mobile 3D C-arm fluoroscopy can be safely incorporated into DBS workflows for both registration and lead verification. For registration, the limited field of view requires the use of frameless transient fiducials and is highly accurate. For lead position verification based on MRI co-registration, we estimate there is around a 0.4 mm discrepancy between lead position seen on 3DXT versus CT when corrected for brain shift. This is similar to that described in O-arm ® or mobile CT series. For units where logistical or financial considerations preclude the acquisition of a cone beam CT or mobile CT scanner, our data support portable 3D C-arm fluoroscopy as an acceptable alternative with significantly lower radiation exposure.

Effect of surgical modification of deep brain stimulation lead trajectories on radiofrequency heating during MRI at 3T: from phantom experiments to clinical implementation

Optimizing the trajectory of deep brain stimulation leads reduces RF heating during MRI at 3 T: Characteristics and clinical translation

Effect of Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition on the RF Heating and Nonsusceptibility Artifact of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI at 1.5T and 3T

Modifying the trajectory of epicardial leads can substantially reduce MRI-induced RF heating in pediatric patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device at 1.5T

Comparative Study of RF Heating in Deep Brain Stimulation Devices During MRI at 1.5 T and 0.55 T: Challenging the Assumption of Safety at Low Field Strengths

Open-bore vertical MRI scanners generate significantly less RF heating around deep brain stimulation leads compared to horizontal scanners

A workflow for predicting radiofrequency-induced heating around bilateral deep brain stimulation electrodes in MRI

Safety and image quality at 7T MRI for deep brain stimulation systems: Ex vivo study with lead-only and full-systems

Study of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Resonant Length in 3.0 T MRI RF Magnetic Field

Optimized Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery to Avoid Vascular Damage: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Path Planning for Various Deep Targets by MRI Image Fusion

Effect of Strain Relief Loop Position on the RF-Induced Heating of Active Implantable Medical Devices at 1.5-T MRI

Safety evaluation of a new setup for transcranial electric stimulation during magnetic resonance imaging

A new method to improve RF safety of implantable medical devices using inductive coupling at 3.0 T MRI

Pathological Findings Around Deep Brain Stimulation Leads in Ultra-High Field MRI

An Integrated Multi-physics Finite Element Modeling Framework for Deep Brain Stimulation: Preliminary Study on Impact of Brain Shift on Neuronal Pathways

Impact of MRI RF coil design on the RF-induced heating of medical implants: fixed B1+ rms exposure vs normal operating mode

Evaluation of 3D C-Arm Fluoroscopy versus Diagnostic CT for Deep Brain Stimulation Stereotactic Registration and Post-Operative Lead Localization

Automatic Reconstruction of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Trajectories From CT Images Using Tracking and Morphological Analysis

Impact of Patient Postures on the RF-Induced Heating for the Active Implantable Medical Device (AIMD) at 1.5T MRI

Use of Neurophysiological Monitoring during MRI-Guided Ablation Procedures at 1.5 Tesla: Workflow and Safety Considerations

How Thin Can a Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Be? (P7.041)