Based Forgiveness Counseling Improve Conduct and Academic Achievement in Academically At-Risk Adolescents ?
M. Gambaro,R. Enright
Abstract:A study of forgiveness counseling (FC) with adolescents showing high Trait Anger is described. Twelve adolescents from ages 11 to 13 were randomly assigned to a fifteen-week school-based intervention in either FC or an alternative treatment control group using a client-centered format. Dependent variables were administered at pretest, post-test, and 4-month follow-up. FC was more effective than the alternative treatment control group in reducing school conduct problems by promoting forgiveness, self-reliance, academic achievement, and positive attitudes toward teachers and parents. Results held at 4-month follow-up. Aggregate effect sizes were strong for post-test and follow-up analyses. Implications for treating high anger and resentment in adolescents are discussed. School-Based Forgiveness Counseling 4 Can School-Based Forgiveness Counseling Improve Conduct and Academic Achievement in Academically At-Risk Adolescents? Forgiveness counseling (FC) is described by a number of counselors and researchers as a promising new approach to anger-reduction and the restoration of emotional health (Enright & Fitzgibbons, 2000; Ripley & Worthington, 2002; Rye et al., 2005). To forgive is not the same as to condone or excuse, to forget, or to reconcile; the latter is an internal response by the one forgiving, whereas reconciliation is a negotiation toward greater trust and a coming together again by two or more people (Worthington, 2005). In a recent issue of this journal our research group described a series of studies focused on forgiveness education in the schools of Belfast, Northern Ireland (Enright, Knutson Enright, Holter, Baskin, & Knutson, 2007). One of the major findings with both 6-7 and 8-9 year olds was that as the students learned about forgiveness, and applied that knowledge to someone who hurt them, there was a tendency to reduce negative emotions. A key point is that the anger was reduced in general and not necessarily only toward the person who needed to be forgiven. Other studies with adults have shown similar patterns: As participants in forgiveness counseling or therapy forgave, they tended to show a general improvement in emotional health (see for example, Freedman & Enright, 1996; Lin, Mack, Enright, Krahn, & Baskin, 2004; and Reed & Enright, 2006). Forgiveness counseling and education, regardless of the age group studied, seem to effect an improvement in emotional health that goes beyond the person who is forgiven. This observation, that specific acts of forgiving a particular person for a particular injustice can have generally positive consequences for emotional regulation, may be explained by the nature of resentment, which is a key reaction to a deep injustice over time when School-Based Forgiveness Counseling 5 forgiveness does not occur (Enright & Fitzgibbons, 2000). Studies of forgiveness show that in the short-run resentment can take the form of negative affect toward the offending person (anger, for example), negative thoughts toward that person (a narrative or script that focuses predominantly on the person’s negative qualities), and negative behavior (ignoring, aggression, revenge-seeking) (see, for example, Enright & Fitzgibbons, 2000; Kaufman, 1984). Over time if the resentment is not resolved, the client can develop general negative affect and mood (high levels of anger, anxiety, and depression that are not centered on the offending person), negative cognition (including negative scripts that are focused not only on the perpetrator but also on the self in the form of low self-esteem), and dysregulated behavior (conduct disorder, for example, that is not centered on the perpetrator). For discussions of this generalized psychological pattern, see Hunter (1978), Fitzgibbons (1986), Enright and Fitzgibbons (2000). Still unanswered is the extent to which forgiveness counseling can show general improvement in one’s attitude toward a wide variety of important people in one’s life. Might students who participate in forgiveness counseling show not only an improvement in their response to the perpetrator and the self but also to school, teachers, parents, and general interpersonal relationships? The findings on generalized improvement in affect, mood, and scripts or narratives toward self as well as the perpetrator suggest that this may be possible. Still unanswered is the extent to which forgiveness counseling in school can show general behavioral improvement in the form of school conduct and academic achievement. Research on the relationships among resentment, emotional dyregulation, school conduct, and academic achievement, suggest that an affirmative hypothesis seems reasonable, as we will see in the following brief literature review on these topics. School-Based Forgiveness Counseling 6 Emotional Regulation, School Behavior, and Academic Achievement Research suggests prior hurtful treatment from others may underlie both emotional or behavioral dysregulation and academic difficulty. Reviews of the literature find abused and neglected children have deficits in emotional adjustment and cognition (Ammerman, Cassisi, Hersen, & Van Hasselt 1986; Lamphear, 1985) that can lead to dysregulation and academic failure. Complimentary findings have been reported in studies of aggression; youth who have been victims of aggression (Dodge & Frame, 1982; Dubow, Huesmann, & Boxer 2003) tend to also have difficulty controlling their own aggressive behavior. An abundance of research demonstrates that youth who have difficulty regulating their emotions and behavior also tend to experience academic difficulty (Loveland, Lounsbury, Welsh, & Buboltz, 2007; Strauss, Frame, & Forehand, 1987; Wiesner & Windle, 2004). This relationship has been examined from multiple perspectives in the educational and psychological literatures. Although researchers approach this relationship from different theoretical foundations and with different research designs, there is considerable agreement that youth who demonstrate poor emotional and behavioral regulation are also likely to struggle academically. Many types of emotional and behavioral dysregulation are associated with poor academic outcomes. Strauss et al. (1987) found that elementary school youth who were rated as anxious by their teachers also had significantly poorer academic ratings than a non-anxious comparison group. Tramontina et al. (2001) found conduct disorder was more common among children who dropped out of school than among the youth who did not dropout of school. This relationship held even after controlling for family and socioeconomic status variables. Difficulty controlling aggression was found to be associated with school dropout and lower grades (French & Conrad, 2001; Loveland et al., 2007). School-Based Forgiveness Counseling 7 The relationships among emotional and behavioral dysregulation and school performance are complex and not necessarily unidirectional. For example, Wiesner and Windle (2004) found that academic difficulty was among the factors that contributed to conduct problems, particularly delinquency. Poor academic performance also predicted recidivism in youth with conduct disorder (Bassarath, 2001). In a meta-analysis, Maguin and Loeber (1996) concluded low school achievement predicted delinquency; disciplinary action, such as suspension, in turn led to removal from the classroom and less opportunity for academic success. Underlying deep anger or resentment may be a key to understanding the subtle interplay of emotional dysregulation, conduct problems, and academic failure. Forgiveness, which reduces the resentment, may be a way of reversing the downward spiral that too many students experience, as they get angry because of unjust treatment, become resentful, and then begin a pattern of behavioral disruption and academic failure in school. For instance, individuals with high Trait Anger have little anger control, react impulsively to criticism, and develop poor social bonds that lead to disruptive behaviors and poor transitions into adulthood (Ensminger & Juon, 1998). Some become so dysfunctional as to be incapable of self-support or satisfactory relationships (Rak & Patterson, 1996). This deep-rooted hostility can also manifest as underachievement in the school setting (Morrison, 1967, 1969). Prior Interventions to Reduced Dysregulated Affect and Behavior in Schools The prevalence of emotional, behavioral, and academic problems among youth (Lerner & Galambos, 1998) has created a great need for effective interventions; indeed, many school-based interventions have been developed. These interventions differ with respect to scope and focus. Some interventions address multiple contexts and are universal in scope (Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group [CPPRG], 2004). Others target intraindividual factors such as School-Based Forgiveness Counseling 8 improving self-management skills (Mooney, Ryan, Uhing, Reid, & Epstein, 2005). Furthermore, some interventions target specific populations of students such as those with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (DuPaul & Weyandt, 2006) while others focus on general populations such as every fifth grader in a school (Brigman, Webb, & Campbell, 2007). Scholars have identified at least four concerns with current school-based interventions: few achieve strong results, few use an experimental design, few measure both improvements in regulatory functioning and academic performance, and few address the underlying cause of the emotional or behavioral problem (CPPRG, 2004; Enright & Fitzgibbons, 2000; Hoagwood et al., 2007). A review of school-based interventions by Hoagwood et al. (2007) indicated that such interventions need to be tested using rigorous scientific methods. Hoagwood et al. identified over 2000 studies of school-based interventions between 1990 and 2006. Of these studies, only 64 met inclusion criteria which meant they were conducted in public schools, used prospective designs, and used e