Abstract:Until recently, most ecological network analyses investigating the effects of species' declines and extinctions have focused on a single type of interaction (e.g. feeding). In nature, however, diverse interactions co-occur, each of them forming a layer of a 'multilayer' network. Data including information on multiple interaction types has recently started to emerge, giving us the opportunity to have a first glance at possible commonalities in the structure of these networks. We studied the structural features of 44 tripartite ecological networks from the literature, each composed of two layers of interactions (e.g. herbivory and pollination), and investigated their robustness to species losses. Considering two interactions simultaneously, we found that the robustness of the whole community is a combination of the robustness of the two ecological networks composing it. The way in which the layers of interactions are connected to each other affects the interdependence of their robustness. In many networks, this interdependence is low, suggesting that restoration efforts would not automatically propagate through the whole community. Our results highlight the importance of considering multiple interactions simultaneously to better gauge the robustness of ecological communities to species loss and to more reliably identify key species that are important for the persistence of ecological communities. In the face of the current biodiversity crisis, predicting how species loss will affect ecological communities is becoming increasingly relevant. Previous studies including only one type of ecological interactions (e.g. feeding or pollination) revealed the relevance of the structure of ecological networks for the persistence of ecological communities. However, there is mounting evidence that considering multiple interactions simultaneously can alter the results based on a single interaction. Here, we study the robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types to the loss of plant species, and we show that it is a combination of the robustness of the two bipartite ecological networks composing the ecological community. By analyzing networks from multiple communities, we are able to identify commonalities across interaction types, as well as singularities specific to a given interaction type, caused by underlying biological constraints. Our results highlight that a multi-interaction approach is crucial to better gauge the overall robustness of ecological communities, and to correctly determine the relative importance of different plants species at the whole community level, which can be key for biodiversity conservation.

Ecological networks across interaction types are modular and highly driven by sampling intensity at biogeographical scales

The Structure of Ecological Networks Across Levels of Organization

The structure and robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types

Telling mutualistic and antagonistic ecological networks apart by learning their multiscale structure

Revealing biases in the sampling of ecological interaction networks

Geographical variation of multiplex ecological networks in marine intertidal communities.

Ecological network complexity scales with area

Bitrophic interactions shape biodiversity in space

Downscaling mutualistic networks from species to individuals reveals consistent interaction niches and roles within plant populations

Six General Ecosystem Properties are more Intense in Biogeochemical Cycling Networks than Food Webs

Mesoscale properties of mutualistic networks in ecosystems

Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size

Trophic Interactions among Vertebrate Guilds and Plants Shape Global Patterns in Species Diversity

How biotic interactions structure species' responses to perturbations

Flower‐visitor and pollen‐load data provide complementary insight into species and individual network roles

Linking Net Interaction Effects with Network Topologies in Food Webs

Nested interaction networks represent a missing link in the study of behavioural and community ecology

Estimated missing interactions change the structure and alter species roles in one of the world's largest seed‐dispersal networks

Experimental evidence for a hidden network of higher-order interactions in a diverse arthropod community

Simplicial structures in ecological networks

Common Organizing Mechanisms in Ecological and Socio-economic Networks