Abstract:Until recently, most ecological network analyses investigating the effects of species' declines and extinctions have focused on a single type of interaction (e.g. feeding). In nature, however, diverse interactions co-occur, each of them forming a layer of a 'multilayer' network. Data including information on multiple interaction types has recently started to emerge, giving us the opportunity to have a first glance at possible commonalities in the structure of these networks. We studied the structural features of 44 tripartite ecological networks from the literature, each composed of two layers of interactions (e.g. herbivory and pollination), and investigated their robustness to species losses. Considering two interactions simultaneously, we found that the robustness of the whole community is a combination of the robustness of the two ecological networks composing it. The way in which the layers of interactions are connected to each other affects the interdependence of their robustness. In many networks, this interdependence is low, suggesting that restoration efforts would not automatically propagate through the whole community. Our results highlight the importance of considering multiple interactions simultaneously to better gauge the robustness of ecological communities to species loss and to more reliably identify key species that are important for the persistence of ecological communities. In the face of the current biodiversity crisis, predicting how species loss will affect ecological communities is becoming increasingly relevant. Previous studies including only one type of ecological interactions (e.g. feeding or pollination) revealed the relevance of the structure of ecological networks for the persistence of ecological communities. However, there is mounting evidence that considering multiple interactions simultaneously can alter the results based on a single interaction. Here, we study the robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types to the loss of plant species, and we show that it is a combination of the robustness of the two bipartite ecological networks composing the ecological community. By analyzing networks from multiple communities, we are able to identify commonalities across interaction types, as well as singularities specific to a given interaction type, caused by underlying biological constraints. Our results highlight that a multi-interaction approach is crucial to better gauge the overall robustness of ecological communities, and to correctly determine the relative importance of different plants species at the whole community level, which can be key for biodiversity conservation.

Bitrophic interactions shape biodiversity in space

Trophic Interactions among Vertebrate Guilds and Plants Shape Global Patterns in Species Diversity

The structure and robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types

Decoupling Species Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Beta Diversity Across a Fragmented Landscape

Positive interactions and the emergence of community structure in metacommunities

The joint influence of competition and mutualism on the biodiversity of mutualistic ecosystems

Belowground top-down and aboveground bottom-up effects structure multitrophic community relationships in a biodiverse forest

Downscaling mutualistic networks from species to individuals reveals consistent interaction niches and roles within plant populations

Animal and Plant Space-Use Drive Plant Diversity-Productivity Relationships

Landscape configuration can flip species–area relationships in dynamic meta-food-webs

Ecological network complexity scales with area

Flower–bee versus pollen–bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes

Untangling the roles of centrality and environmental contribution in diversity patterns across spatial scales

Telling mutualistic and antagonistic ecological networks apart by learning their multiscale structure

Habitat Fragmentation Affects Richness—A View Through a Metacommunity Lens

Ecological networks across interaction types are modular and highly driven by sampling intensity at biogeographical scales

The hump-shaped effect of plant functional diversity on the biological control of a multi-species pest community

Invasive species modulate the structure and stability of a multilayer mutualistic network

Habitat isolation diminishes potential of self-organised pattern formation to promote local diversity in metacommunities

Neighbourhood benthic configuration reveals hidden co-occurrence social diversity

Species traits and community structure can drive large-scale spatial propagation of effects in ecosystems