Abstract:Understanding the biodiversity‐productivity relationships is a focal topic in ecology, but unravelling their reciprocal nature remains challenging. The authors demonstrate that higher‐resolution longitudinal data along with methods to control for a broader suite of confounding variables can be used to resolve reciprocal relationships. The authors highlight future data needs and methods that can help us to resolve biodiversity‐productivity relationships, crucial for reconciling a long‐running debate in ecology and ultimately, to understand how biodiversity and ecosystem functioning respond to global change. Relationships between plant biodiversity and productivity are highly variable across studies in managed grasslands, partly because of the challenge of accounting for confounding's and reciprocal relationships between biodiversity and productivity in observational data collected at a single point in time. Identifying causal effects in the presence of these challenges requires new analytical approaches and repeated observations to determine the temporal ordering of effects. Though rarely available, data collected at multiple time points within a growing season can help to disentangle the effects of biodiversity on productivity and vice versa. Here we advance this understanding using seasonal grassland surveys from 150 managed grassland sites repeated over 2 years, along with statistical methods that are relatively new in ecology, that aim to infer causal relationships from observational data. We compare our approach to common methods used in ecology, that is, mixed‐effect models, and to analyses that use observations from only one point in time within the growing seasons. We find that mixed models overestimated the effect of biodiversity on productivity by two standard errors as compared to our main models, which find no evidence for a strong positive effect. For the effect of productivity on biodiversity we found a negative effect using mixed models which was highly sensitive to the time at which the data was collected within the growing season. In contrast, our main models found no evidence for an effect. Conventional models overestimated the effects between biodiversity and productivity, likely due to confounding variables. Synthesis. Understanding the biodiversity‐productivity relationships is a focal topic in ecology, but unravelling their reciprocal nature remains challenging. We demonstrate that higher‐resolution longitudinal data along with methods to control for a broader suite of confounding variables can be used to resolve reciprocal relationships. We highlight future data needs and methods that can help us to resolve biodiversity‐productivity relationships, crucial for reconciling a long‐running debate in ecology and ultimately, to understand how biodiversity and ecosystem functioning respond to global change.

Animal and Plant Space-Use Drive Plant Diversity-Productivity Relationships

The Hidden Role of Multi-Trophic Interactions in Driving Diversity-Productivity Relationships

Environmental heterogeneity modulates the effect of plant diversity on the spatial variability of grassland biomass

Land use imperils plant and animal community stability through changes in asynchrony rather than diversity

Landscape configuration can flip species–area relationships in dynamic meta-food-webs

Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment

Decomposer diversity and identity influence plant diversity effects on ecosystem functioning

Species richness promotes plant productivity by suppressing plant antagonists

Weak reciprocal relationships between productivity and plant biodiversity in managed grasslands

The productivity-biodiversity relationship varies across diversity dimensions

Can niche plasticity promote biodiversity-productivity relationships through increased complementarity?

Effects of plant diversity on productivity strengthen over time due to trait-dependent shifts in species overyielding

Multiple facets of diversity effects on plant productivity: Species richness, functional diversity, species identity and intraspecific competition

Bitrophic interactions shape biodiversity in space

Mycorrhizal associations modify tree diversity−productivity relationships across experimental tree plantations

Diversity-enhanced canopy space occupation and leaf functional diversity jointly promote overyielding in tropical tree communities

Plant diversity effects on arthropods and arthropod-dependent ecosystem functions in a biodiversity experiment

Using plant traits to understand the contribution of biodiversity effects to annual crop community productivity

Species pool distributions along functional trade-offs shape plant productivity–diversity relationships

Multitrophic arthropod diversity mediates tree diversity effects on primary productivity

Nutrients and Herbivores Impact Grassland Stability Across Spatial Scales Through Different Pathways