Abstract:Novel pollen co‐transport networks reveal that plants (e.g., Delphinium uliginosum—DEUL shown at the centre of the figure) face different pollen‐pollen competitive landscapes [indicated, for example, by the variation in modularity (Q)] as they travel on the bodies of different pollinators with unexplored ecological and evolutionary consequences. Different node colour within networks indicates different modules of potential pollen‐pollen interactions. The patterns and drivers of pollen transport on insect bodies can have important consequences for plant reproductive success and floral evolution; however, they remain little studied. Recently, pollinator bodies have been further described as pollen competitive arenas, where pollen grains can compete for space, with implications for the evolution of pollen dispersal strategies and plant community assembly. However, the identity, strength, and diversity of pollen competitive interactions and how they vary across pollinator functional groups is not known. Evaluating patterns and drivers of the pollen co‐transport landscape and how these vary across different pollinator groups is central to further our understanding of floral evolution and co‐flowering community assembly. Here, we integrate information on the number and identity of pollen grains on individual insect pollen loads with network analyses to uncover novel pollen co‐transport networks and how these vary across pollinator functional groups (bees and bee flies). We further evaluate differences in pollen load size, species composition, diversity and phylogenetic diversity among insect groups and how these relate to body size and gender. Pollen co‐transport networks were diverse and highly modular in bees, with groups of pollen species interacting more often with each other on insect bodies. However, the number, identity and frequency of competitors that pollen grains encounter on insect bodies vary between some pollinator functional groups. Other aspects of pollen loads such as their size, richness and phylogenetical diversity were shaped by bee size or gender, with females carrying larger but less phylogenetically diverse pollen loads than males. Synthesis. Our results show that the number, identity and phylogenetic relatedness of pollen competitors changes as pollen grains travel on the body of different pollinators. As a result, pollinator groups impose vastly different interaction landscapes during pollen transport, with so far unknown consequences for plant reproductive success, floral evolution and community assembly.

Flower‐visitor and pollen‐load data provide complementary insight into species and individual network roles

The Topological Differences Between Visitation and Pollen Transport Networks: a Comparison in Species Rich Communities of the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains

Flower visits and pollinator pollen load networks reveal the effects of pollinator sharing on heterospecific pollen transfer in a subalpine plant community

Pollinator individual‐based networks reveal the specialized plant–pollinator mutualism in two biodiverse communities

Patterns and drivers of pollen co‐transport network structure vary across pollinator functional groups

Pollen-insect interaction meta-networks identify key relationships for conservation in mosaic agricultural landscapes

Constructing more informative plant–pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community

Constructing more comprehensive pollination networks: integrating diurnal and nocturnal pollen data with visitation in a subalpine wetland community

Effect of network structure and adaptive foraging on pollination services of species-rich plant-pollinator communities

Using individual‐based trait frequency distributions to forecast plant‐pollinator network responses to environmental change

Evolutionary and ecological factors structure a plant–bumblebee network in a biodiversity hotspot, the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains

Interaction network structure explains species' temporal persistence in empirical plant–pollinator communities

Flower–bee versus pollen–bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes

Species interactions in an Andean bird-flowering plant network: phenology is more important than abundance or morphology

Stable species and interactions in plant-pollinator networks deviate from core position in fragmented habitats

Floral richness and seasonality influences bee and non-bee flower interactions in urban community gardens

Relative Species Abundance Successfully Predicts Nestedness and Interaction Frequency of Monthly Pollination Networks in an Alpine Meadow.

Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network

Niche complementarity among pollinators increases community-level plant reproductive success

Emergence of structure in plant–pollinator networks: low floral resource constrains network specialisation

A phylogenetic perspective on ecological specialisation reveals hummingbird and insect pollinators have generalist diets