Plasma microRNAs are sensitive indicators of inter-strain differences in the severity of liver injury induced in mice by a choline- and folate-deficient diet.

V. Tryndyak,J. Latendresse,Beverly A. Montgomery,S. Ross,F. Beland,I. Rusyn,I. Pogribny

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2012.04.018

IF: 4.46

2012-07-01

Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Flower–bee versus pollen–bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes

Felipe Librán-Embid,Ingo Grass,Carine Emer,Viviana Alarcón-Segura,Hermann Behling,Siria Biagioni,Cristina Ganuza,Celina Herrera-Krings,Christina Ani Setyaningsih,Teja Tscharntke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.2604

2024-05-31

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract:Understanding the organization of mutualistic networks at multiple spatial scales is key to ensure biological conservation and functionality in human-modified ecosystems. Yet, how changing habitat and landscape features affect pollen–bee interaction networks is still poorly understood. Here, we analysed how bee–flower visitation and bee–pollen-transport interactions respond to habitat fragmentation at the local network and regional metanetwork scales, combining data from 29 fragments of calcareous grasslands, an endangered biodiversity hotspot in central Europe. We found that only 37% of the total unique pairwise species interactions occurred in both pollen-transport and flower visitation networks, whereas 28% and 35% were exclusive to pollen-transport and flower visitation networks, respectively. At local level, network specialization was higher in pollen-transport networks, and was negatively related to the diversity of land cover types in both network types. At metanetwork level, pollen transport data revealed that the proportion of single-fragment interactions increased with landscape diversity. Our results show that the specialization of calcareous grasslands’ plant–pollinator networks decreases with landscape diversity, but network specialization is underestimated when only based on flower visitation information. Pollen transport data, more than flower visitation, and multi-scale analyses of metanetworks are fundamental for understanding plant–pollinator interactions in human-dominated landscapes.

ecology,evolutionary biology,biology
Local and Landscape Factors Influence Plant-Pollinator Networks and Bee Foraging Behavior across an Urban Corridor

Gabriella L. Pardee,Kimberly M. Ballare,John L. Neff,Lauren Q. Do,DianaJoyce Ojeda,Elisa J. Bienenstock,Berry J. Brosi,Tony H. Grubesic,Jennifer A. Miller,Daoqin Tong,Shalene Jha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020362

IF: 3.905

2023-01-30

Land

Abstract:Given widespread concerns over human-mediated bee declines in abundance and species richness, conservation efforts are increasingly focused on maintaining natural habitats to support bee diversity in otherwise resource-poor environments. However, natural habitat patches can vary in composition, impacting landscape-level heterogeneity and affecting plant-pollinator interactions. Plant-pollinator networks, especially those based on pollen loads, can provide valuable insight into mutualistic relationships, such as revealing the degree of pollination specialization in a community; yet, local and landscape drivers of these network indices remain understudied within urbanizing landscapes. Beyond networks, analyzing pollen collection can reveal key information about species-level pollen preferences, providing plant restoration information for urban ecosystems. Through bee collection, vegetation surveys, and pollen load identification across ~350 km of urban habitat, we studied the impact of local and landscape-level management on plant-pollinator networks. We also quantified pollinator preferences for plants within urban grasslands. Bees exhibited higher foraging specialization with increasing habitat heterogeneity and visited fewer flowering species (decreased generality) with increasing semi-natural habitat cover. We also found strong pollinator species-specific flower foraging preferences, particularly for Asteraceae plants. We posit that maintaining native forbs and supporting landscape-level natural habitat cover and heterogeneity can provide pollinators with critical food resources across urbanizing ecosystems.

environmental studies
Flowering plant communities mediate the effects of habitat composition and configuration on wild pollinator communities

Mark A. K. Gillespie,Mathilde Baude,Jacobus Biesmeijer,Nigel Boatman,Giles E. Budge,Andrew Crowe,Nancy Davies,Rebecca Evans,Jane Memmott,R. Daniel Morton,Ellen Moss,Simon G. Potts,Stuart P. M. Roberts,Clare Rowland,Deepa Senapathi,Simon M. Smart,Claire Wood,William E. Kunin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14666

IF: 6.282

2024-10-03

Functional Ecology

Abstract:Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. There is strong evidence that landscape‐scale factors such as habitat diversity, composition and configuration are important drivers of declines in pollinators and pollination services. However, context and species‐specific responses make it challenging to draw general conclusions about the most important components of landscapes that support diverse and abundant pollinator communities. In this study, we took a functional‐traits approach to community assembly and tested the hypothesis that landscape properties act most strongly on pollinators indirectly, through their influence on flowering plant communities. Using plant and pollinator data from 96 landscapes in Britain, we tested the associations between plant and pollinator communities and local environmental factors, such as habitat cover and configuration, using path analysis based on Mantel and partial Mantel statistics. When all pollinators were considered, we found that the environmental factors had stronger links to the composition of flowering plant communities than to the composition of pollinator communities. Further, the flowering plant community was strongly linked to the pollinator community suggesting a mediating role between land use and pollinators. When separating the pollinator community into taxonomic groups, we found the same result for hoverflies, but wild bees were linked to both environmental factors and flowering plants. We further explored these links with structural equation models using the response‐effect trait framework as a guiding principle. We found strong evidence that land‐use composition and configuration influence the trait distribution and functional diversity of the pollinator community via plant community composition. These findings suggest that the indirect effect of land use on pollinators via flowering plants should be considered in informing the design of pollinator friendly landscapes and in future research of the effects of land use and management on wild pollinators. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

ecology
Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition

Vincent Doublet,Toby Doyle,Isobel Refoy,Sophie Hedges,Claire Carvell,Mark J. F. Brown,Lena Wilfert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9442

IF: 3.167

2022-10-29

Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:We investigated the potential of wildflower strips to modify plant‐pollinator networks. By comparing networks from wildflower strips and other agricultural field margin habitats, we found that increasing flower species richness significantly reduced network connectance, a measure of network complexity, and marginally reduced bee species' niche overlap, a proxy for insect competition. These findings are of general relevance in ecology and epidemiology, as we provide a new framework for the development of conservation measures where ecological interactions and network structure are taken into consideration beyond the current target of increasing species richness and abundance. Ecological restoration programs are established to reverse land degradation, mitigate biodiversity loss, and reinstate ecosystem services. Following recent agricultural intensification that led to a decrease in flower diversity and density in rural areas and subsequently to the decline of many insects, conservation measures targeted at pollinators have been established, including sown wildflower strips (WFS) along field margins. Historically successful in establishing a high density of generalist bees and increasing pollinator diversity, the impact of enhanced flower provision on wider ecological interactions and the structure of pollinator networks has been rarely investigated. Here, we tested the effects of increasing flower species richness and flower density in agricultural landscapes on bee‐plant interaction networks. We measured plant species richness and flower density and surveyed honeybee and bumblebee visits on flowers across a range of field margins on 10 UK farms that applied different pollinator conservation measures. We found that both flower species richness and flower density significantly increased bee abundance, in early and late summer, respectively. At the network level, we found that higher flower species richness did not significantly alter bee species' generality indices, but significantly reduced network connectance and marginally reduced niche overlap across honeybees and bumblebee species, a proxy for insect competition. While higher connectance and niche overlap is believed to strengthen network robustness and often is the aim for the restoration of pollinator networks, we argue that carefully designed WFS may benefit bees by partitioning their foraging niche, limiting competition for resources and the potential for disease transmission via shared floral use. We also discuss the need to extend WFS and their positive effects into spring when wild bee populations are established.

ecology,evolutionary biology
Constructing more informative plant–pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community

G. Ballantyne,Katherine C. R. Baldock,P. G. Willmer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1130

2015-09-07

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract:Interaction networks are widely used as tools to understand plant–pollinator communities, and to examine potential threats to plant diversity and food security if the ecosystem service provided by pollinating animals declines. However, most networks to date are based on recording visits to flowers, rather than recording clearly defined effective pollination events. Here we provide the first networks that explicitly incorporate measures of pollinator effectiveness (PE) from pollen deposition on stigmas per visit, and pollinator importance (PI) as the product of PE and visit frequency. These more informative networks, here produced for a low diversity heathland habitat, reveal that plant–pollinator interactions are more specialized than shown in most previous studies. At the studied site, the specialization index was lower for the visitation network than the PE network, which was in turn lower than for the PI network. Our study shows that collecting PE data is feasible for community-level studies in low diversity communities and that including information about PE can change the structure of interaction networks. This could have important consequences for our understanding of threats to pollination systems.
Flower‐visitor and pollen‐load data provide complementary insight into species and individual network roles

Alyssa R. Cirtwill,Helena Wirta,Riikka Kaartinen,Gavin Ballantyne,Graham N. Stone,Helen Cunnold,Mikko Tiusanen,Tomas Roslin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10301

2024-02-21

Oikos

Abstract:Most animal pollination results from plant–insect interactions, but how we perceive these interactions may differ with the sampling method adopted. The two most common methods are observations of visits by pollinators to plants and observations of pollen loads carried by insects. Each method could favour the detection of different species and interactions, and pollen load observations typically reveal more interactions per individual insect than visit observations. Moreover, while observations concern plant and insect individuals, networks are frequently analysed at the level of species. Although networks constructed using visitation and pollen‐load data have occasionally been compared in relatively specialised, bee‐dominated systems, it is not known how sampling methodology will affect our perception of how species (and individuals within species) interact in a more generalist system. Here we use a Diptera‐dominated high‐Arctic plant–insect community to explore how sampling approach shapes several measures of species' interactions (focusing on specialisation), and what we can learn about how the interactions of individuals relate to those of species. We found that species degrees, interaction strengths, and species motif roles were significantly correlated across the two method‐specific versions of the network. However, absolute differences in degrees and motif roles were greater than could be explained by the greater number of interactions per individual provided by the pollen‐load data. Thus, despite the correlations between species roles in networks built using visitation and pollen‐load data, we infer that these two perspectives yield fundamentally different summaries of the ways species fit into their communities. Further, individuals' roles generally predicted the species' overall role, but high variability among individuals means that species' roles cannot be used to predict those of particular individuals. These findings emphasize the importance of adopting a dual perspective on bipartite networks, as based on the different information inherent in insect visits and pollen loads.

ecology
Constructing more comprehensive pollination networks: integrating diurnal and nocturnal pollen data with visitation in a subalpine wetland community

Yue Teng,Jana C. Vamosi,Xiao-Fan Wang,Yan-Bing Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1464970

IF: 5.6

2024-10-08

Frontiers in Plant Science

Abstract:Introduction: Sampling for describing plant–pollinator interaction networks has been performed using techniques that either focus on the plants (with flower-visit data) or the animals (with analyzing pollen on the body surface of flower visitors). The differences in the structure of the networks obtained using these methods likely influences our understanding of the contribution of nocturnal pollinators, yet this key finding has yet to be the focus of study. Methods: In this study, we conducted an intensive diurnal field survey in the subalpine meadows of the Dajiuhu Wetland and supplemented the data with an analysis of diurnal and nocturnal pollen data to examine the changes in pollination networks. Results: We observed 41 plant and 154 pollinator species, corresponding to 665 specific interactions. Visitation and pollen analyses showed significant differences in the composition and interaction between network plants and pollinators, resulting in important structural changes in the network. Given that the diurnal pollen data showed new links that were preferentially attached to highly connected nodes, the level of asymmetric specialization did not decrease; however, nestedness increased 1.3-fold, and mean pollinator connectivity from 3.1 to 5.1. As the behaviors of nocturnal pollinators tended to be more specialized, the inclusion of nocturnal pollen data led to an increase in the number of extreme-specialist pollinator species. Consequently, nestedness decreased 0.8-fold, but mean plant connectivity went from 14.2 to 16.2. Discussion: These findings suggest that the structure of pollination networks is influenced by the sampling methods and the level of detail of the investigation. Our study has strong implications for the development of monitoring schemes for plant–pollinator interactions. Due to the practical difficulties of nocturnal field visitation, when conducting research, combining diurnal field visitation with both diurnal and nocturnal pollen analyses is the most convenient and realistic method to capture the full complexity of these networks.

plant sciences
Pollinator richness, pollination networks, and diet adjustment along local and landscape gradients of resource diversity

Carmelo Gómez‐Martínez,Miguel A. González‐Estévez,Joana Cursach,Amparo Lázaro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2634

IF: 6.105

2022-04-11

Ecological Applications

Abstract:Loss of habitats and native species, introduction of invasive species, and changing climate regimes lead to the homogenization of landscapes and communities, affecting the availability of habitats and resources for economically important guilds, such as pollinators. Understanding how pollinators and their interactions vary along resource diversity gradients at different scales may help to determine their adaptability to current diversity loss related to global change. We used data on 20 plant‐pollinator communities along gradients of flower richness (local diversity) and landscape heterogeneity (landscape diversity) to understand how the diversity of resources at local and landscape scales affected: (1) wild pollinator abundance and richness (accounting also for honeybee abundance); (2) the structure of plant‐pollinator networks; (3) the proportion of actively selected interactions (those not occurring by neutral processes) and (4) pollinator diet breadth and species' specialization in networks. Wild pollinator abundance was higher overall in flower‐rich and heterogeneous habitats, while wild pollinator richness increased with flower richness (more strongly for beetles and wild bees) and decreased with honeybee abundance. Network specialization (H2'), modularity, and functional complementarity were all positively related to floral richness and landscape heterogeneity, indicating niche segregation as the diversity of resources increases at both scales. Flower richness also increased the proportion of actively selected interactions (especially for wild bees and flies), whereas landscape heterogeneity had a weak negative effect on this variable. Overall, network‐level metrics responded to larger landscape scales than pollinator‐level metrics did. Higher floral richness resulted in a wider taxonomic and functional diet for all the study guilds, while functional diet increased mainly for beetles. Despite this, specialization in networks (d') increased with flower richness for all the study guilds, because pollinator species fed on a narrower subset of plants as communities became richer in species. Our study indicates that pollinators are able to adapt their diet to resource changes at local and landscape scales. However, resource homogenization might lead to poor and generalist pollinator communities, where functionally specialized interactions are lost. This study highlights the importance of including different scales to understand the effects of global change on pollination service through changes in resource diversity.

environmental sciences,ecology
Effect of network structure and adaptive foraging on pollination services of species-rich plant-pollinator communities

Fernanda S Valdovinos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.02.626462

2024-12-02

Abstract:Network science has had a great impact on ecology by providing tools to characterize the structure of species interactions in communities and evaluate the effect of such network structure on community dynamics. This has been particularly the case for the study of plant-pollinator communities, which has experienced a tremendous growth with the adoption of network analyses. Here, I build on such body of research to evaluate how network structure and adaptive foraging of pollinators affect ecosystem services of plant-pollinator communities. Specifically, I quantify -- using model simulations -- pollen deposition in networks that exhibit structures like the ones of empirical networks (hereafter empirically connected networks) and those with higher connectance and lower nestedness than empirical networks, for scenarios where pollinators are fixed foragers and scenarios where they are adaptive foragers. I found that empirically connected networks with adaptive foraging exhibit the highest pollen deposition rate. Increased network connectance reduces pollen deposition as increased number of interactions lead to greater conspecific pollen dilution in the absence of other mechanisms such as pollinator floral constancy. High nestedness in moderately connected networks increases the proportion of pollinators visiting only one or two plant species, which are associated with the highest quality visits. Adaptive foraging allows pollinators to quantitatively specialize on specialist plant species which increases conspecific pollen deposition. This research advances pollination biology by elucidating how population dynamics, consumer-resource interactions, adaptive foraging, and network structure affects pollen deposition in a network context.

Ecology
Urbanisation and agricultural intensification modulate plant–pollinator network structure and robustness

Willem Proesmans,Emeline Felten,Emilien Laurent,Matthias Albrecht,Nathan Cyrille,Audrey Labonté,Corina Maurer,Robert Paxton,Oliver Schweiger,Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi,Adam J. Vanbergen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14503

IF: 6.282

2024-01-26

Functional Ecology

Abstract:Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Land use change is a major pressure on pollinator abundance, diversity and plant–pollinator interactions. Far less is known about how land‐use alters the structure of plant–pollinator networks and their robustness to plant–pollinator coextinctions. We analysed the structure of plant–pollinator networks sampled in 12 landscapes along an urbanisation and agricultural intensity gradient, from early spring to late summer 2021, and used a stochastic coextinction model to correlate plant–pollinator coextinction risk with network structure (species and network‐level metrics) and landscape context. Networks in intensively managed (i.e., agricultural and urban) landscapes had a lower risk of initiating a coextinction cascade, while networks in less intensively managed landscapes may be less robust. Network structure modulated the frequency and severity of coextinctions and species loss, while the strength of species interactions increased robustness. Urban networks were more species rich and symmetrical due to the high diversity of ornamental plants, while intensively managed agricultural landscapes had smaller, more tightly connected and nested networks. Network structure modulated the frequency of extinctions, which was decreased by greater linkage density, interaction asymmetry and interaction dependence in the networks, while once an extinction occurred, nestedness and linkage density propagated the degree of the coextinction cascade and species loss. At the species level, species strength was inversely correlated with extinction risk, implying that generalist species with a high number of interactions with specialists had the lowest extinction risk. An interplay between land‐use and network structure affects community robustness to coextinctions with implications for pollination services and plant reproduction. Land‐use change or other global change pressures by reorganising species interactions can alter communities and their potential functioning. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

ecology
Soil–Plant–Pollinator Relationships in Urban Grass and Meadow Habitats: Competing Benefits and Demands of Tall Flowering Plants on Soil and Pollinator Diversity

Will Rust,Madison Sotkewicz,Zhaoxing Li,Theresa Mercer,Alice S. Johnston

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060354

2024-06-20

Diversity

Abstract:Urban green spaces can be important habitats for soil, plant, and pollinator diversity and the complementary ecosystem functions they confer. Most studies tend to investigate the relationships between plant diversity with either soil or pollinator diversity, but establishing their relationship across habitat types could be important for optimising ecosystem service provision via alternative management (for instance, urban meadows in place of short amenity grass). Here, we investigate soil–plant–pollinator relationships across urban grass and meadow habitats through a range of measured biodiversity (soil mesofauna and macrofauna, plants, aboveground invertebrates, and pollinators) and edaphic variables. We found significant effects of habitat type on available nutrients (plant and soil C:N ratios) but less clear relationships were observed between habitat type and diversity metrics. Soil–plant–pollinator interactions across habitat types and sites showed an interconnection, whereby flowering plant abundance increased alongside soil macrofauna abundance. Site characteristics that showed strong effects on plant and invertebrate diversity metrics were C:N ratios (plant and soil) and soil pH, suggesting a potential role of nutrient availability on soil–plant–pollinator associations. Our results suggest that a combination of short-mown grass, tall grass, and sown flowers can provide greater benefits for soil and pollination services as each habitat type benefits different taxa due to differing sensitivities to management practices. For example, pollinators benefit from sown flowers but soil fauna are sensitive to annual sowing. Our results also indicate that sown flowers may not optimise overall biodiversity as expected due to disturbance and the depleting role of tall, flowering plants on soil nutrient availability. Future research across a greater range of sites in urban landscapes would resolve the potential role of nutrient availability in modulating soil–plant–pollinator interactions in urban green spaces.

ecology,biodiversity conservation
Healthy Vinton: A Health Impact Assessment Focused on Water and Sanitation in a Small Rural Town on the U.S.-Mexico Border

W. Hargrove,Patricia M. Juárez-Carillo,M. Korc

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120403864

IF: 4.614

2015-04-01

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:We conducted a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) focused on water and sanitation in Vinton, TX, a small rural town on the U.S./Mexico Border. We present the Vinton HIA as a case study to inform the practice of HIA in rural limited resource communities with higher than average levels of unemployment and poverty, and limited infrastructure. Household surveys, focus groups, and interviews provided quantitative and qualitative data on water sources and quality, sanitation practices, and community health. We found that some of the current water sources in Vinton did not meet drinking water standards for total dissolved solids and arsenic; the majority of septic tanks were not managed properly; and there was a short-term risk of water scarcity due to prolonged drought in the region. Prevalent ailments reported by participants included stomach problems, diarrhea, and skin problems. These ailments can be related to arsenic and/or biological organisms in water. The positive direct and indirect health impacts of improved water and sanitation in Vinton included: reduced gastrointestinal illnesses and skin disorders; improved water quality, quantity, and pressure; reduced risks from failing septic systems; increased property value; potential economic growth; and enhanced quality of life. The negative direct and indirect impacts included: residents’ initial and monthly costs; increased property taxes; increased debt by local government; and the need for ongoing support from changing elected decision makers. The unique challenges in completing this HIA included: (a) limited available data; (b) a culture of fear and distrust among residents; (c) residents’ lack of education, awareness, and civic discourse regarding water and sanitation issues and their impact on public health; and (d) lack of civic discourse and participation in the democratic process. An important outcome of the HIA was the characterization of local water supplies, which motivated and empowered the community members to become more involved in civic discourse concerning their water supplies. Results are transferable to similar low-income rural communities worldwide where residents are lacking in information about their water supplies and in political “voice”.
Pollinators respond positively to urban green space enhancements using wild and ornamental flowers

Oliver Poole,Alba Costa,Christopher N. Kaiser‐Bunbury,Rosalind F. Shaw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12779

IF: 4.266

2024-09-10

Insect Conservation and Diversity

Abstract:Green spaces enhanced for nature are higher in pollinator diversity and are more resilient to urbanisation than unenhanced green spaces. Additional non‐native floral plantings at enhanced sites attract a higher diversity of pollinators and more Dipteran visits than sites only enhanced with native wildflowers, supporting a mixed‐planting approach. Diverse floral plantings in urban areas benefit the pollinator community while also enhancing the recreational function of these spaces for people. Pollinator diversity and abundance are under direct threat from human activities. Despite societal dependence on pollinators for crop production, humankind continues to drive pollinator declines through agricultural intensification and urbanisation. Urban environments can provide refuge to some pollinators. There is a need, however, to understand how pollinator communities can be supported in these areas while also considering human needs. Public green spaces provide a promising avenue to target plant–pollinator conservation measures in an urban setting due to their large area, high abundance and low plant–pollinator biodiversity. We used a paired design to compare the plant community, pollinator community and plant–pollinator interactions of (i) public urban green spaces enhanced with wildflower meadows and pollinator‐friendly ornamental plantings to (ii) control unenhanced urban green spaces. The planting types within enhanced sites were also separately compared. Our results show that not only was the diversity of the overall pollinator community higher in enhanced than control sites, but also the complexity of some wild Hymenoptera and the abundance of Diptera pollinator groups. The negative impact of urbanisation on some pollinator groups was reduced in enhanced sites compared with control sites. Planting both pollinator‐friendly ornamental plants and wildflower meadows significantly increased the visits from Diptera and the diversity in the plant–pollinator community compared with wildflower plantings alone. Our results suggest that enhancing public spaces for pollinators has positive effects on key groups and can help mitigate the impacts of urbanisation. Non‐native ornamental plants can also play a role in enhancing green spaces for pollinators while maintaining their recreational functions. This supports a mixed‐planting approach for improving public green spaces in urban areas for both people and nature.

entomology
Special Issue Containing Papers Presented at the Second Upper Michigan Combinatorics Workshop on Designs, Codes and Geometries - Preface

V. Tonchev

Abstract:
The Topological Differences Between Visitation and Pollen Transport Networks: a Comparison in Species Rich Communities of the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains

Yan-Hui Zhao,Amparo Lazaro,Zong-Xin Ren,Wei Zhou,Hai-Dong Li,Zhi-Bin Tao,Kun Xu,Zhi-Kun Wu,Lorne M. Wolfe,De-Zhu Li,Hong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05262

2018-01-01

Oikos

Abstract:Pollination networks are usually constructed and assessed by direct field observations which commonly assume that all flower visitors are true pollinators. However, this assumption is often invalid and the use of data based on mere visitors to flowers may lead to a misunderstanding of intrinsic pollination networks. Here, using a large dataset by both sampling floral visitors and analyzing their pollen loads, we constructed 32 networks pairs (visitation versus pollen transport) across one flowering season at four elevation sites in the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains region. Pollen analysis was conducted to determine which flower visitors acted as potential pollinators (pollen vectors) or as cheaters (those not carrying pollen of the visited plants). We tested whether there were topological differences between visitation and pollen transport networks and whether different taxonomic groups of insect visitors differed in their ability to carry pollen of the visited plants. Our results indicated that there was a significantly higher degree of specialization at both the network and species levels in the pollen transport networks in contrast to the visitation networks. Modularity was lower but nestedness was higher in the visitation networks compared to the pollen transport networks. All the cheaters were identified as peripheral species and most of them contributed positively to the nested structure. This may explain in part the differences in modularity and nestedness between the two network types. Bees carried the highest proportion of pollen of the visited plants. This was followed by Coleoptera, other Hymenoptera and Diptera. Lepidoptera carried the lowest proportion of pollen of the visited plants. Our study shows that the construction of pollen transport networks could provide a more in‐depth understanding of plant–pollinator interactions. Moreover, it suggests that detecting and removing cheater interactions when studying the topology of other mutualistic networks might be also important.
Floral richness and seasonality influences bee and non-bee flower interactions in urban community gardens

Julia Marion Schmack,Monika Egerer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01353-9

IF: 2.686

2023-05-11

Urban Ecosystems

Abstract:Pollinating insects are essential for food production. Both bee and non-bee pollinators are undergoing dramatic declines due to land use intensification and its consequences on native ecosystems. While interactions between crops and bee pollinators are well studied, our understanding of the pollination service provided by non-bee flower visitors including flies, ants, beetles and others is still limited. Moreover, the effects of landscape urbanization and changes in floral and nesting resource availability on the network structure of pollinators with both cultivated and wild plants have been poorly studied. We assessed which common bee and non-bee flower visitor groups dominate the interactions with both wild (e.g. Trifolium pratense , Taraxacum officinales ) and cultivated plants (e.g. Fragaria ananassa , Cucurbita pepo ) in urban community gardens in Berlin and Munich and explored how these interactions between flower visitor groups and plants change over the growing season. We further investigated the effect of changes in urbanization surrounding community gardens, and the availability of floral and nesting resources within gardens on the complexity (i.e. nestedness, linkage density, connectance) of interaction networks. We observed 20 focal plant species and 13 common bee and non-bee flower visitor groups in 30 urban community gardens. We found that dominant plant visitors changed over the growing season, with non-bee flower visitors including ants and flies as dominant early season visitors, and bee pollinators as important visitors later in the season. Nestedness of the flower visitor network increased with increases in floral richness in community gardens, while neither floral abundance nor the impervious surface surrounding the community gardens, garden size or the availability of nesting resources in gardens strongly influenced the flower visitor networks. Our findings suggest that high floral richness in community gardens may ensure the complexity and, thus, the stability of flower visitor networks. Findings further suggest that the role of non-bee flower visitors should be considered for pollination service provision especially in the shoulder seasons. Finally, our results emphasize that urban gardeners play a key role in mediating flower visitor interactions through their gardening practices.

biodiversity conservation,ecology
Flower visits and pollinator pollen load networks reveal the effects of pollinator sharing on heterospecific pollen transfer in a subalpine plant community

Qiang Fang,Jiajun Wu,Tao Zhang,Suyan Ba,Chunyan Zhao,Panfeng Dai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11244

IF: 3.167

2024-04-10

Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:The degree of pollinator sharing, based on either the flower visits or the pollinator pollen load networks, positively influenced the amount of heterospecific pollen transferred between plant species pairs. However, the degree of pollinator sharing had a low overall explanatory power for heterospecific pollen transfer, and the explanatory powers of the flower visit and pollinator pollen load networks were similar. The mutualistic network of plant–pollinator also involves interspecific pollination caused by pollinator sharing. Plant–pollinator networks are commonly based on flower visit observations, which may not adequately represent the actual pollen transfer between co‐flowering plant species. Here, we compared the network structure of plant–pollinator interactions based on flower visits (FV) and pollen loads (PL) on the bodies of pollinators and tested how the degree of pollinator sharing in the two networks affected heterospecific pollen transfer (HPT) between plant species in a subalpine meadow. The FV and PL networks were largely overlapped. PL network included more links than FV network. The positions of plant and pollinator species in the FV and PL networks were positively correlated, indicating that both networks could detect major plant–pollinator interactions. The degree of pollinator sharing, based on either the FV or the PL network, positively influenced the amount of heterospecific pollen transferred between plant species pairs. However, the degree of pollinator sharing had a low overall explanatory power for HPT, and the explanatory powers of the FV and PL networks were similar. Overall, our study highlights the importance of FV and PL for understanding the drivers and outcomes of plant–pollinator interactions, as well as their relevance to HPT.

ecology,evolutionary biology
Intensive pasture management alters the composition and structure of plant-pollinator interactions in Sibiu, Romania

Ana-Maria Neacă,Julia Meis,Tiffany Knight,Demetra Rakosy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16900

IF: 3.061

2024-02-29

PeerJ

Abstract:Background Land management change towards intensive grazing has been shown to alter plant and pollinator communities and the structure of plant-pollinator interactions in different ways across the world. Land-use intensification in Eastern Europe is shifting highly diverse, traditionally managed hay meadows towards intensive pastures, but few studies have examined how this influences plant-pollinator networks. We hypothesized that the effects of intensive grazing on networks will depend on how plant communities and their floral traits change. Methods We investigated plant and pollinator diversity and composition and the structure of plant-pollinator interactions near Sibiu, Romania at sites that were traditionally managed as hay meadows or intensive pastures. We quantified the identity and abundance of flowering plants, and used transect walks to observe pollinator genera interacting with flowering plant species. We evaluated the effects of management on diversity, composition and several indices of network structure. Results Pollinator but not plant diversity declined in pastures and both plant and pollinator taxonomic composition shifted. Functional diversity and composition remained unchanged, with rather specialized flowers having been found to dominate in both hay meadows and pastures. Apis mellifera was found to be the most abundant pollinator. Its foraging preferences played a crucial role in shaping plant-pollinator network structure. Apis mellifera thus preferred the highly abundant Dorycnium herbaceum in hay meadows, leading to hay meadows networks with lower Shannon diversity and interaction evenness. In pastures, however, it preferred less abundant and more generalized flower resources. With pollinators being overall less abundant and more generalized in pastures, we found that niche overlap between plants was higher. Discussion With both hay meadows and pastures being dominated by plant species with similar floral traits, shifts in pollinator preferences seem to have driven the observed changes in plant-pollinator interaction networks. We thus conclude that the effects of grazing on pollinators and their interactions are likely to depend on the traits of plant species present in different management types as well as on the effects of grazing on plant community composition. We thereby highlight the need for better understanding how floral abundance shapes pollinator visitation rates and how floral traits may influence this relationship.

multidisciplinary sciences
Impact of landscape configuration and composition on pollinator communities across different European biogeographic regions

Irene Bottero,Christophe Dominik,Olivier Schweiger,Matthias Albrecht,Eleanor Attridge,Mark J. F. Brown,Elena Cini,Cecilia Costa,Pilar De la Rúa,Joachim R. de Miranda,Gennaro Di Prisco,Daniel Dzul Uuh,Simon Hodge,Kjell Ivarsson,Anina C. Knauer,Alexandra-Maria Klein,Marika Mänd,Vicente Martínez-López,Piotr Medrzycki,Helena Pereira-Peixoto,Simon Potts,Risto Raimets,Janine M. Schwarz,Deepa Senapathi,Giovanni Tamburini,Estefanía Tobajas Talaván,Jane C. Stout,Maj Rundlöf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1128228

IF: 3

2023-05-06

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:Introduction: Heterogeneity in composition and spatial configuration of landscape elements support diversity and abundance of flower-visiting insects, but this is likely dependent on taxonomic group, spatial scale, weather and climatic conditions, and is particularly impacted by agricultural intensification. Here, we analyzed the impacts of both aspects of landscape heterogeneity and the role of climatic and weather conditions on pollinating insect communities in two economically important mass-flowering crops across Europe. Methods: Using a standardized approach, we collected data on the abundance of five insect groups (honey bees, bumble bees, other bees, hover flies and butterflies) in eight oilseed rape and eight apple orchard sites (in crops and adjacent crop margins), across eight European countries (128 sites in total) encompassing four biogeographic regions, and quantified habitat heterogeneity by calculating relevant landscape metrics for composition (proportion and diversity of land-use types) and configuration (the aggregation and isolation of land-use patches). Results: We found that flower-visiting insects responded to landscape and climate parameters in taxon- and crop-specific ways. For example, landscape diversity was positively correlated with honey bee and solitary bee abundance in oilseed rape fields, and hover fly abundance in apple orchards. In apple sites, the total abundance of all pollinators, and particularly bumble bees and solitary bees, decreased with an increasing proportion of orchards in the surrounding landscape. In oilseed rape sites, less-intensively managed habitats (i.e., woodland, grassland, meadows, and hedgerows) positively influenced all pollinators, particularly bumble bees and butterflies. Additionally, our data showed that daily and annual temperature, as well as annual precipitation and precipitation seasonality, affects the abundance of flower-visiting insects, although, again, these impacts appeared to be taxon- or crop-specific. Discussion: Thus, in the context of global change, our findings emphasize the importance of understanding the role of taxon-specific responses to both changes in land use and climate, to ensure continued delivery of pollination services to pollinator-dependent crops.

ecology
Untangling biodiversity interactions: A meta network on pollination in Earth's most diverse tropical savanna

Ludmilla M. S. Aguiar,Ugo M. Diniz,Igor D. Bueno‐Rocha,Laura R. A. Filomeno,Luísa S. Aguiar‐Machado,Priscilla A. Gomes,Pedro H. B. Togni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11094

IF: 3.167

2024-03-13

Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:We addressed how pollination meta network with vertebrate and invertebrate species is assembled in the world's most diverse savanna and identified potential biogeographical bias within the region. We found a generalization of interactions at the meta network level but a high degree of specialization within the modules, where bees are the module connectors and vertebrates account for most specialized interactions. We found a solid biogeographical bias that limits our knowledge of how interactions are assembled in this severely threatened biome. Pollination is vital for ecosystem functioning, especially in biodiversity‐rich regions like the Brazilian Cerrado. Our research establishes a comprehensive meta network of pollinator–plant interactions within this biome. We quantified the importance of different pollinator groups, identifying keystone species. We examined potential biases in sampling effort and the spatial behavior of interactions within the heterogeneous Cerrado plant physiognomies. Our investigation uncovered 1499 interactions among 293 plant species and 386 visitor species, with legitimate pollination accounting for 42.4% of the interactions. The network exhibited modularity, driven by bees and insects, with vertebrates bridging diurnal and nocturnal modules. While a generalized pattern emerged, high specialization existed within modules due to habitat diversity. Bees, particularly Apis mellifera (exotic) and Trigona spinipes (native), played central roles as network hubs. Hummingbirds and bats, engaged in specialized interactions showing strong connectivity within and between modules. Interestingly, invertebrate–vertebrate modules were more prevalent than expected in the meta network. However, a bias was evident, primarily within specific biogeographical districts with fragmented landscapes and intrusion from other biomes. Variations in plant species and endemism rates influenced pollinator occurrence and the Cerrado network topology. Our study offers valuable insights into pollinator–plant interactions within the Cerrado, encompassing both invertebrates and vertebrates. The modeled network represents a significant step in understanding the structural complexity of pollination networks, integrating partial networks from diverse pollination systems within heterogeneous habitats. Nevertheless, a biogeographical bias could limit a comprehensive understanding of network functionality across the Cerrado.

ecology,evolutionary biology

Plasma microRNAs are sensitive indicators of inter-strain differences in the severity of liver injury induced in mice by a choline- and folate-deficient diet.

Flower–bee versus pollen–bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes

Local and Landscape Factors Influence Plant-Pollinator Networks and Bee Foraging Behavior across an Urban Corridor

Flowering plant communities mediate the effects of habitat composition and configuration on wild pollinator communities

Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition

Constructing more informative plant–pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community

Flower‐visitor and pollen‐load data provide complementary insight into species and individual network roles

Constructing more comprehensive pollination networks: integrating diurnal and nocturnal pollen data with visitation in a subalpine wetland community

Pollinator richness, pollination networks, and diet adjustment along local and landscape gradients of resource diversity

Effect of network structure and adaptive foraging on pollination services of species-rich plant-pollinator communities

Urbanisation and agricultural intensification modulate plant–pollinator network structure and robustness

Soil–Plant–Pollinator Relationships in Urban Grass and Meadow Habitats: Competing Benefits and Demands of Tall Flowering Plants on Soil and Pollinator Diversity

Healthy Vinton: A Health Impact Assessment Focused on Water and Sanitation in a Small Rural Town on the U.S.-Mexico Border

Pollinators respond positively to urban green space enhancements using wild and ornamental flowers

Special Issue Containing Papers Presented at the Second Upper Michigan Combinatorics Workshop on Designs, Codes and Geometries - Preface

The Topological Differences Between Visitation and Pollen Transport Networks: a Comparison in Species Rich Communities of the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains

Floral richness and seasonality influences bee and non-bee flower interactions in urban community gardens

Flower visits and pollinator pollen load networks reveal the effects of pollinator sharing on heterospecific pollen transfer in a subalpine plant community

Intensive pasture management alters the composition and structure of plant-pollinator interactions in Sibiu, Romania

Impact of landscape configuration and composition on pollinator communities across different European biogeographic regions

Untangling biodiversity interactions: A meta network on pollination in Earth's most diverse tropical savanna