Abstract:Until recently, most ecological network analyses investigating the effects of species' declines and extinctions have focused on a single type of interaction (e.g. feeding). In nature, however, diverse interactions co-occur, each of them forming a layer of a 'multilayer' network. Data including information on multiple interaction types has recently started to emerge, giving us the opportunity to have a first glance at possible commonalities in the structure of these networks. We studied the structural features of 44 tripartite ecological networks from the literature, each composed of two layers of interactions (e.g. herbivory and pollination), and investigated their robustness to species losses. Considering two interactions simultaneously, we found that the robustness of the whole community is a combination of the robustness of the two ecological networks composing it. The way in which the layers of interactions are connected to each other affects the interdependence of their robustness. In many networks, this interdependence is low, suggesting that restoration efforts would not automatically propagate through the whole community. Our results highlight the importance of considering multiple interactions simultaneously to better gauge the robustness of ecological communities to species loss and to more reliably identify key species that are important for the persistence of ecological communities. In the face of the current biodiversity crisis, predicting how species loss will affect ecological communities is becoming increasingly relevant. Previous studies including only one type of ecological interactions (e.g. feeding or pollination) revealed the relevance of the structure of ecological networks for the persistence of ecological communities. However, there is mounting evidence that considering multiple interactions simultaneously can alter the results based on a single interaction. Here, we study the robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types to the loss of plant species, and we show that it is a combination of the robustness of the two bipartite ecological networks composing the ecological community. By analyzing networks from multiple communities, we are able to identify commonalities across interaction types, as well as singularities specific to a given interaction type, caused by underlying biological constraints. Our results highlight that a multi-interaction approach is crucial to better gauge the overall robustness of ecological communities, and to correctly determine the relative importance of different plants species at the whole community level, which can be key for biodiversity conservation.

Experimental evidence for a hidden network of higher-order interactions in a diverse arthropod community

Connecting higher‐order interactions with ecological stability in experimental aquatic food webs

Ant-Plant Interaction in a Tropical Savanna: May the Network Structure Vary over Time and Influence on the Outcomes of Associations?

When can higher‐order interactions produce stable coexistence?

Advances in Higher-Order Interactions Between Organisms

Genetics-based interactions of foundation species affect community diversity, stability and network structure

Cooperative Network Dynamics

Interaction between trophobiont insects and ants: the effect of mutualism on the associated arthropod community

Higher‐order species interactions cause time‐dependent niche and fitness differences: Experimental evidence in plant‐feeding arthropods

The structure and robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types

Interaction network rewiring and species' contributions to community-scale flexibility

Interaction networks in persistent Lotka-Volterra communities

A three-species synthetic community model whose rapid response to antagonism allows the study of higher-order dynamics and emergent properties in minutes

Imprints of indirect interactions on a resource-mediated ant–plant network across different levels of network organization

Hypernetwork modeling and topology of high-order interactions for complex systems

Bitrophic interactions shape biodiversity in space

Ecological networks across interaction types are modular and highly driven by sampling intensity at biogeographical scales

Beyond Direct Neighbourhood Effects: Higher-Order Interactions Improve Modelling and Predicting Tree Survival and Growth

Interaction capacity underpins community diversity

Nested interaction networks represent a missing link in the study of behavioural and community ecology

Contextualizing the ecology of plant–plant interactions and constructive networks