Abstract:Understanding temporal dynamics in ecological networks is crucial to predict their capability to cope with global changes. Despite this, proper quantification of network dynamics still remains a challenge. Temporal dynamics are typically studied using data of interaction networks over time, through the evaluation of interaction turnover and its two components: changes related to species turnover (species gains and losses) or rewiring (switching partners among the set of species shared over time). However, with this approach based exclusively on network data, dynamics are computed similarly for species that are truly missing from the community at a given temporal period, and for species occurring in the community but that do not interact with any other. This might lead to an underestimation of the real extent of rewiring, while overestimating the species turnover component of interaction turnover. We used data on 20 plant–pollinator communities to calculate interaction turnover components accounting also for the species that occurred in the communities at different temporal periods but did not appear in some of the temporal interaction networks (non‐interacting species) and then compared these estimates with conventional ones. Besides, we used empirical data and simulations to evaluate the extent to which dynamics estimates were affected by sampling effort when including and excluding non‐interacting species. As expected, disregarding the non‐interacting species that occurred in the communities at different temporal periods led to the underestimation of rewiring and the overestimation of species turnover as components of interaction turnover. Effect size was moderate when independent pollinator data were included, and large when including plants or both trophic levels. Simulations indicated that, in general, considering the non‐interacting species reduced biases at the time of identifying changes due to the different interaction turnover components. Accounting for non‐interacting species was particularly important to reduce bias when sampling effort was low and when dynamics were calculated seasonally. Despite sampling effort effects, phenology was the main determinant of species' rewiring frequencies. Our approach contributes to reducing biases and improving the estimates of interaction flexibility in networks, which are necessary to comprehend the response of communities in the face of global change. Resumen Entender la dinámica temporal de las redes ecológicas es fundamental para predecir su capacidad de respuesta frente a cambios globales. Pese a esto, la cuantificación adecuada de la dinámica de redes es aún un reto. Habitualmente, las dinámicas temporales se estudian usando datos de redes de interacciones en el tiempo, a través de la evaluación del recambio de interacciones y sus dos componentes: cambios debidos al recambio de especies (ganancia y pérdida de especies) o recableado (cambios de pareja entre el conjunto de especies compartidas a lo largo del tiempo). Sin embargo, con este enfoque basado exclusivamente en datos de redes, las dinámicas se calculan de manera similar para las especies que están realmente ausentes de la comunidad en un periodo de tiempo determinado, como para las especies que están presentes en la comunidad pero que no interactúan con ninguna otra especie. Esto debe subestimar la verdadera magnitud del recableado, mientras se sobreestima el componente de recambio de especies. Utilizamos datos de 20 comunidades de plantas y polinizadores para calcular los componentes del recambio de interacciones teniendo en cuenta también las especies que aparecieron en las comunidades en diferentes períodos temporales pero que no estaban en las redes de interacciones (especies no interactuantes), para posteriormente comparar estas estimas con las convencionales (usando solo datos de redes). Además, utilizamos datos empíricos y simulaciones para evaluar hasta qué punto las estimas de las dinámicas se veían afectadas por el esfuerzo de muestreo al incluir y excluir especies no interactuantes. Como se esperaba, no tener en cuenta las especies no interactuantes que estaban en las comunidades en diferentes períodos temporales llevó a la subestimación del recableado y a la sobreestimación del recambio de especies como componentes del recambio de interacciones. El tamaño del efecto fue moderado cuando se incluyeron datos independientes de polinizadores, y grande cuando se incluyeron plantas o ambos niveles tróficos. Las simulaciones indicaron que, en general, considerar las especies no interactuantes redujo los sesgos al identificar cambios debido a los diferentes componentes del recambio de interacciones. Tener en cuenta las especies no interactuantes fue particularmente importante para reducir el sesgo cuando el esfuerzo de muestreo era bajo y cuando las dinámicas se calculaban estacionalmente. A pesar de los efectos del esfuerzo de mues -Abstract Truncated-

Estimated missing interactions change the structure and alter species roles in one of the world's largest seed‐dispersal networks

Downscaling mutualistic networks from species to individuals reveals consistent interaction niches and roles within plant populations

The reliability of regional ecological knowledge to build local interaction networks: a test using seed-dispersal networks across land-bridge islands

A new tool to improve the estimates of interaction rewiring considering the whole community composition

The structure and robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types

Plant-frugivore network simplification under habitat fragmentation leaves a small core of interacting generalists

Interaction rewiring can buffer the reduction of long‐distance dispersal of seeds when large birds go extinct: an allometric perspective

Revealing biases in the sampling of ecological interaction networks

Stable species and interactions in plant-pollinator networks deviate from core position in fragmented habitats

Co‐Occurrence Patterns Do Not Predict Mutualistic Interactions Between Plant and Butterfly Species

Covariate-informed latent interaction models: Addressing geographic & taxonomic bias in predicting bird-plant interactions

Are threatened species important for glueing interaction networks together?

Species interactions affect dispersal: a meta-analysis

Invasive species modulate the structure and stability of a multilayer mutualistic network

Bitrophic interactions shape biodiversity in space

Frugivore-mediated seed dispersal in fragmented landscapes: Compositional and functional turnover from forest to matrix

Temporal changes in the structure of a plant-frugivore network are influenced by bird migration and fruit availability

Intraspecific variation in fruit-frugivore interactions: effects of fruiting neighborhood and consequences for seed dispersal

Searching for keystone plant resources in fruit‐frugivore interaction networks across the Neotropics

Effect of network structure and adaptive foraging on pollination services of species-rich plant-pollinator communities

Ecological networks across interaction types are modular and highly driven by sampling intensity at biogeographical scales