Abstract:Implicit adaptation has been regarded as a rigid process that automatically operates in response to movement errors to keep the sensorimotor system precisely calibrated. This hypothesis has been challenged by recent evidence suggesting flexibility in this learning process. One compelling line of evidence comes from work suggesting that this form of learning is context-dependent, with the rate of learning modulated by error history. Specifically, learning was attenuated in the presence of perturbations exhibiting high variance compared to when the perturbation is fixed. However, these findings are confounded by the fact that the adaptation system corrects for errors of different magnitudes in a non-linear manner, with the adaptive response increasing in a proportional manner to small errors and saturating to large errors. Through simulations, we show that this non-linear motor correction function is sufficient to explain the effect of perturbation variance without referring to an experience-dependent change in error sensitivity. Moreover, by controlling the distribution of errors experienced during training, we provide empirical evidence showing that there is no measurable effect of perturbation variance on implicit adaptation. As such, we argue that the evidence to date remains consistent with the rigidity assumption. An ideal learner should be sensitive to the statistics of the environment and adjust their behavior accordingly. For example, the rate of learning in response to a change in the environment is faster when the environment is relatively predictable (low uncertainty) compared to when it is unpredictable (high uncertainty). Here we look at this phenomenon in the context of sensorimotor adaptation, the automatic and implicit process that keeps the sensorimotor system precisely calibrated. The results show that this system is surprisingly rigid, with no modulation of the learning rate in response to changes in the variability of the environment. We propose that, whereas processes associated with the action selection system are flexible and modified based on context, the adaptation system is engineered to ensure that the selected action is properly executed, regardless of the optimality of that action. This insensitivity to context may serve to minimize interference with the more flexible processes involved in action selection.

Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback has limited spatiotemporal properties compared with adaptation to physical perturbations

Memories of Motor Adaptation Do Not Necessarily Decay with Behavioral Unlearning.

Sensorimotor Knowledge From Task-Irrelevant Feedback Contributes To Motor Learning

Visuomotor memory is not bound to visual motion

Motor adaptation to environment changes predicting interactable object behaviour can be flexible and implicit

A conversion from slow to fast memory in response to passive motion

Dissociating the Influence of Limb Posture and Visual Feedback Shifts on the Adaptation to Novel Movement Dynamics

Durability of motor learning by observing

Taking aim at the perceptual side of motor learning: Exploring how explicit and implicit learning encode perceptual error information through depth vision

Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback

The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation

Different Sensory Information Is Used for State Estimation when Stationary or Moving

Task-relevant visual feedback uncertainty attenuates visuomotor adaptation

Perturbation Variability Does Not Influence Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation

"Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation.

Error-independent effect of sensory uncertainty on motor learning when both feedforward and feedback control processes are engaged

Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.

Advanced feedback enhances sensorimotor adaptation

Feedback control of recurrent dynamics constrains learning timescales during motor adaptation

Perceptual error based on Bayesian cue combination drives implicit motor adaptation

Visuomotor Adaptation and Sensory Recalibration in Reversed Hand Movement Task.