Abstract:Abstract Motor learning in visuomotor adaptation tasks results from both explicit and implicit processes, each responding differently to an error signal. While the motor output side of these processes is extensively studied, their visual input side is relatively unknown. We investigated if and how depth perception affects the computation of error information by explicit and implicit motor learning. Two groups of participants threw virtual darts at a virtual dartboard while receiving perturbed endpoint feedback. The Delayed group was allowed to re-aim and their feedback was delayed to emphasize explicit learning, while the Clamped group received clamped cursor feedback which they were told to ignore, and continued to aim straight at the target to emphasize implicit adaptation. Both groups played this game in a highly detailed virtual environment (Depth condition) and in an empty environment (No-Depth condition). The Delayed group showed an increase in error sensitivity under Depth relative to No-Depth conditions. In contrast, the Clamped group adapted to the same degree under both conditions. The movement kinematics of the Delayed participants also changed under the Depth condition, consistent with the target appearing more distant, unlike the Clamped group. A comparison of the Delayed behavioral data with a perceptual task from the same individuals showed that the effect of the Depth condition on the re-aiming direction was consistent with an increase in the scaling of the error distance and size. These findings suggest that explicit and implicit learning processes may rely on different sources of perceptual information. New & Noteworthy We leveraged a classic sensorimotor adaptation task to perform a first systematic assessment of the role of perceptual cues in the estimation of an error signal in the 3D space during motor learning. We crossed two conditions presenting different amounts of depth information, with two manipulations emphasizing explicit and implicit learning processes. Explicit learning responded to the visual conditions, consistent with perceptual reports, while implicit learning appeared to be independent of them.

Visuomotor memory is not bound to visual motion

Memories of Motor Adaptation Do Not Necessarily Decay with Behavioral Unlearning.

Sensorimotor Knowledge From Task-Irrelevant Feedback Contributes To Motor Learning

Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations

A conversion from slow to fast memory in response to passive motion

Visuomotor feedback tuning in the absence of visual error information

Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback has limited spatiotemporal properties compared with adaptation to physical perturbations

Error-independent effect of sensory uncertainty on motor learning when both feedforward and feedback control processes are engaged

Visuomotor Adaptation and Sensory Recalibration in Reversed Hand Movement Task.

Taking aim at the perceptual side of motor learning: Exploring how explicit and implicit learning encode perceptual error information through depth vision

Visuomotor learning is dependent on direction-specific error saliency.

Performing a reaching task with one arm while adapting to a visuomotor rotation with the other can lead to complete transfer of motor learning across the arms

Factors governing the assignment of visual consequence to the corresponding action

Behavioral / Cognitive Eliminating Direction Specificity in Visuomotor Learning

Eliminating Direction Specificity in Visuomotor Learning.

Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback

Two ways to learn in visuomotor adaptation

Working memory constraints for visuomotor retrieval strategies

Task-relevant visual feedback uncertainty attenuates visuomotor adaptation

Contributions of the Primary Sensorimotor Cortex and Posterior Parietal Cortex to Motor Learning and Transfer

Durability of motor learning by observing