Abstract:We routinely make fine motor adjustments to maintain optimal motor performance. These adaptations have been attributed to both implicit, error-based mechanisms, and explicit, strategy-based mechanisms. However, little is known about the neural basis of implicit vs. explicit learning. Here, we aimed to use anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to probe the relationship between different brain regions and learning mechanisms during a visuomotor adaptation task in humans. We hypothesized that anodal tDCS over the cerebellum (CB) should increase implicit learning while anodal tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), a region associated with higher-level cognition, should facilitate explicit learning. Using a horizontal visuomotor adaptation task that measures explicit/implicit contributions to learning (Taylor et al., 2014), we found that dlPFC stimulation significantly improved performance compared to the other groups, and weakly increased explicit learning. However, CB stimulation had no effects on either target error or implicit learning. Previous work showed variable CB stimulation effects only on a vertical visuomotor adaptation task (Jalali et al., 2017), so in Experiment 2, we conducted the same study using a vertical context to see if we could find effects of CB stimulation. We found only weak effects of CB stimulation on target error and implicit learning, and now the dlPFC effect did not replicate. To resolve this discrepancy, in Experiment 3, we examined the effect of context (vertical vs. horizontal) on implicit and explicit contributions and found that individuals performed significantly worse and used greater implicit learning in the vertical screen condition compared to the horizontal screen condition. Across all experiments, however, there was high inter-individual variability, with strong influences of a few individuals, suggesting that these effects are not consistent across individuals. Overall, this work provides preliminary support for the idea that different neural regions can be engaged to improve visuomotor adaptation, but shows that each region's effects are highly context-dependent and not clearly dissociable from one another. This holds implications especially in neurorehabilitation, where an intact neural region could be engaged to potentially compensate if another region is impaired. Future work should examine factors influencing interindividual variability during these processes.

Taking aim at the perceptual side of motor learning: Exploring how explicit and implicit learning encode perceptual error information through depth vision

Perceptual Scale Expansion: A Natural Design for Improving the Precision of Motor Control.

Pointing Accurately at a Target Doesn't Require Perceiving Its Location Accurately

Sensorimotor Knowledge From Task-Irrelevant Feedback Contributes To Motor Learning

Perceptual error based on Bayesian cue combination drives implicit motor adaptation

Implicit audiomotor adaptation

"Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation.

Task-relevant visual feedback uncertainty attenuates visuomotor adaptation

Prediction error in implicit adaptation during visually- and memory-guided reaching tasks

Limb-related sensory prediction errors and task-related performance errors facilitate human sensorimotor learning through separate mechanisms

The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation

Variable Neural Contributions to Explicit and Implicit Learning During Visuomotor Adaptation

The Effect of Visual Uncertainty on Implicit Motor Adaptation

Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems

Attention defines the context for implicit sensorimotor adaptation

Implicit Adaptation is Fast, Robust and Independent from Explicit Adaptation

Subtle Visual Latency Can Profoundly Impair Implicit Sensorimotor Learning

Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations

Attenuation of implicit motor learning with consecutive exposure to visual errors

Implicit adaptation is modulated by the relevance of feedback