Abstract:Sensorimotor adaptation is influenced by both the size and variance of error information. In the present study, we varied visual uncertainty and error size in a factorial manner and evaluated their joint effect on adaptation, using a feedback method that avoids inherent limitations with standard visuomotor tasks. Uncertainty attenuated adaptation, but only when the error was small. This striking interaction highlights a novel constraint for models of sensorimotor adaptation. Sensorimotor adaptation is driven by sensory prediction errors, the difference between the predicted and actual feedback. When the position of the feedback is made uncertain, motor adaptation is attenuated. This effect, in the context of optimal sensory integration models, has been attributed to the motor system discounting noisy feedback and thus reducing the learning rate. In its simplest form, optimal integration predicts that uncertainty would result in reduced learning for all error sizes. However, these predictions remain untested since manipulations of error size in standard visuomotor tasks introduce confounds in the degree to which performance is influenced by other learning processes such as strategy use. Here, we used a novel visuomotor task that isolates the contribution of implicit adaptation, independent of error size. In two experiments, we varied feedback uncertainty and error size in a factorial manner. At odds with the basic predictions derived from the optimal integration theory, the results show that uncertainty attenuated learning only when the error size was small but had no effect when the error size was large. We discuss possible mechanisms that may account for this interaction, considering how uncertainty may interact with the relevance assigned to the error signal or how the output of the adaptation system in terms of recalibrating the sensorimotor map may be modified by uncertainty. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sensorimotor adaptation is influenced by both the size and variance of error information. In the present study, we varied visual uncertainty and error size in a factorial manner and evaluated their joint effect on adaptation, using a feedback method that avoids inherent limitations with standard visuomotor tasks. Uncertainty attenuated adaptation but only when the error was small. This striking interaction highlights a novel constraint for models of sensorimotor adaptation.

The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation

Audiomotor prediction errors drive speech adaptation even in the absence of overt movement

Neurophysiological evidence of sensory prediction errors driving speech sensorimotor adaptation

Implicit audiomotor adaptation

Taking aim at the perceptual side of motor learning: Exploring how explicit and implicit learning encode perceptual error information through depth vision

Sensorimotor learning during synchronous speech is modulated by the acoustics of the other voice

Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic explicit strategy in human motor learning

Motor adaptation to environment changes predicting interactable object behaviour can be flexible and implicit

Sensorimotor Knowledge From Task-Irrelevant Feedback Contributes To Motor Learning

"Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation.

The Effect of Visual Uncertainty on Implicit Motor Adaptation

The effects of auditory consequences on visuomotor adaptation and motor memory

Sensorimotor Adaptation to Formant-Shifted Auditory Feedback Is Predicted by Language-Specific Factors in L1 and L2 Speech Production

Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems

Two ways to learn in visuomotor adaptation

Implicit Adaptation is Fast, Robust and Independent from Explicit Adaptation

Perceptual error based on Bayesian cue combination drives implicit motor adaptation

Implicit contributions to dual visuomotor adaptation

Perturbation Variability Does Not Influence Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation

Visuomotor Adaptation and Sensory Recalibration in Reversed Hand Movement Task.

Prediction error in implicit adaptation during visually- and memory-guided reaching tasks