Abstract:Current models of motor learning suggest that multiple timescales support adaptation to changes in visual or mechanical properties of the environment. These models capture patterns of learning and memory across a broad range of tasks, yet do not consider the possibility that rapid changes in behavior may occur without adaptation. Such changes in behavior may be desirable when facing transient disturbances, or when unpredictable changes in visual or mechanical properties of the task make it difficult to form an accurate model of the perturbation. Whether humans can modulate control strategies without an accurate model of the perturbation remains unknown. Here we frame this question in the context of robust control (H∞-control), a control strategy that specifically considers unpredictable disturbances by increasing initial movement speed and feedback gains. Correspondingly, we demonstrate in two human reaching experiments including males and females that the occurrence of a single unpredictable disturbance led to an increase in movement speed and in the gain of rapid feedback responses to mechanical disturbances on subsequent movements. This strategy reduced perturbation-related motion regardless of the direction of the perturbation. Furthermore, we found that changes in the control strategy were associated with co-contraction, which amplified the gain of muscle responses to both lengthening and shortening perturbations. These results have important implications for studies on motor adaptation because they highlight that trial-by-trial changes in limb motion also reflected changes in control strategies dissociable from error-based adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans and animals use internal representations of movement dynamics to anticipate the impact of predictable disturbances. However, we are often confronted with transient or unpredictable disturbances, and it remains unknown whether and how the nervous system handles these disturbances over fast time scales. Here we hypothesized that humans can modulate their control strategy to make reaching movements less sensitive to perturbations. We tested this hypothesis in the framework of robust control, and found changes in movement speed and feedback gains consistent with the model predictions. These changes impacted participants' behavior on a trial-by-trial basis. We conclude that compensation for disturbances over fast time scales involves a robust control strategy, which potentially plays a key role in motor planning and execution.

Motor adaptation to environment changes predicting interactable object behaviour can be flexible and implicit

Memories of Motor Adaptation Do Not Necessarily Decay with Behavioral Unlearning.

Motor adaptation does not differ when a perturbation is introduced abruptly or gradually

Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic explicit strategy in human motor learning

Perturbation Variability Does Not Influence Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation

The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation

Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations

Sensorimotor Knowledge From Task-Irrelevant Feedback Contributes To Motor Learning

Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback has limited spatiotemporal properties compared with adaptation to physical perturbations

Robust Control in Human Reaching Movements: A Model-Free Strategy to Compensate for Unpredictable Disturbances

Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback

Dissociating the Influence of Limb Posture and Visual Feedback Shifts on the Adaptation to Novel Movement Dynamics

The Effect of Visual Uncertainty on Implicit Motor Adaptation

Implicit motor adaptation patterns in a redundant motor task manipulating a stick with both hands

Taking aim at the perceptual side of motor learning: Exploring how explicit and implicit learning encode perceptual error information through depth vision

Perceptual error based on Bayesian cue combination drives implicit motor adaptation

Visuomotor Adaptation and Sensory Recalibration in Reversed Hand Movement Task.

Implicit audiomotor adaptation

Two different motor learning mechanisms contribute to learning reaching movements in a rotated visual environment

Task-relevant visual feedback uncertainty attenuates visuomotor adaptation

Implicit Adaptation is Fast, Robust and Independent from Explicit Adaptation