Abstract:Sensorimotor adaptation is influenced by both the size and variance of error information. In the present study, we varied visual uncertainty and error size in a factorial manner and evaluated their joint effect on adaptation, using a feedback method that avoids inherent limitations with standard visuomotor tasks. Uncertainty attenuated adaptation, but only when the error was small. This striking interaction highlights a novel constraint for models of sensorimotor adaptation. Sensorimotor adaptation is driven by sensory prediction errors, the difference between the predicted and actual feedback. When the position of the feedback is made uncertain, motor adaptation is attenuated. This effect, in the context of optimal sensory integration models, has been attributed to the motor system discounting noisy feedback and thus reducing the learning rate. In its simplest form, optimal integration predicts that uncertainty would result in reduced learning for all error sizes. However, these predictions remain untested since manipulations of error size in standard visuomotor tasks introduce confounds in the degree to which performance is influenced by other learning processes such as strategy use. Here, we used a novel visuomotor task that isolates the contribution of implicit adaptation, independent of error size. In two experiments, we varied feedback uncertainty and error size in a factorial manner. At odds with the basic predictions derived from the optimal integration theory, the results show that uncertainty attenuated learning only when the error size was small but had no effect when the error size was large. We discuss possible mechanisms that may account for this interaction, considering how uncertainty may interact with the relevance assigned to the error signal or how the output of the adaptation system in terms of recalibrating the sensorimotor map may be modified by uncertainty. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sensorimotor adaptation is influenced by both the size and variance of error information. In the present study, we varied visual uncertainty and error size in a factorial manner and evaluated their joint effect on adaptation, using a feedback method that avoids inherent limitations with standard visuomotor tasks. Uncertainty attenuated adaptation but only when the error was small. This striking interaction highlights a novel constraint for models of sensorimotor adaptation.

Perturbation Variability Does Not Influence Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation

Memories of Motor Adaptation Do Not Necessarily Decay with Behavioral Unlearning.

The Effect of Visual Uncertainty on Implicit Motor Adaptation

Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic explicit strategy in human motor learning

Perceptual error based on Bayesian cue combination drives implicit motor adaptation

Motor adaptation does not differ when a perturbation is introduced abruptly or gradually

Error-independent effect of sensory uncertainty on motor learning when both feedforward and feedback control processes are engaged

Implicit Adaptation is Fast, Robust and Independent from Explicit Adaptation

Attention defines the context for implicit sensorimotor adaptation

The Nervous System Uses Nonspecific Motor Learning in Response to Random Perturbations of Varying Nature.

Prior uncertainty impedes discrete locomotor adaptation

Interference underlies attenuation upon relearning in sensorimotor adaptation

Task-relevant visual feedback uncertainty attenuates visuomotor adaptation

Sensorimotor adaptation impedes perturbation detection in grasping

Task relevance selectively modulates sensorimotor adaptation in the presence of multiple prediction errors.

Motor adaptation to environment changes predicting interactable object behaviour can be flexible and implicit

Implicit audiomotor adaptation

Relevance of Error: What Drives Motor Adaptation?

Evidence for an efferent-based prediction contributing to implicit motor adaptation

Not fleeting but lasting: Limited influence of aging on implicit adaptative motor learning and its short-term retention